I don’t get it...if two men or two women can legally marry what sense is there excluding mother and daughter? What explanation is there for that?
Yep - the central theme behind the argument for homosexual “marriage” is “Any two people who love each other should be allowed to marry”.
A logical legal question even though those two would make a strong completion for first place in an ugly competition.
I second that.
Clearly, this activity is wrong and all normal people are horrified at the thought. But, from a legal standpoint, what possible grounds exist today to indicate that such a marriage is improper? What is the definition of marriage now? I assume it’s pretty much “anything goes” if two men can get married. Why not a mother and daughter?
They opened the door to this, and any decision that “this isn’t OK” now just comes across as completely arbitrary.
That's the price you pay for being ahead of your time in progressive America.
They'll win the Nobel peace prize posthumously, and be honored at the Oscars.
Hey. This a “civilized” society.
Because patriarchy.
Because.
Going by the same twisted arguments the left has used to promote homosexuality as great in the courts and on the media, I can’t think of any reason why the same people would oppose a mother and her daughter or a son and his father getting it on at a Holiday Inn somewhere...
thats where we are in America...