Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyn

Beyond slippery slope, this is outright a violation of constitutional rights. So a neighbor complaining about someone is all it takes to subject you to confiscation and psychological evaluation. This should chill both left and right to the bone, but of course it won’t. The left sees it as an effective tool for their political agenda and the right are all to often cheerleaders for police power.


8 posted on 03/17/2018 7:16:26 AM PDT by Bull Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Man

Not sure that I agree. The cops went and interviewed him and Baker Act’d him. The Baker Act has a pretty high threshold for police to act. You have to express an intent to hurt yourself or others. Sometimes even gun owners lose it.


11 posted on 03/17/2018 7:18:41 AM PDT by TallahasseeConservative (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: VRW Conspirator; Bull Man
...prohibiting a person who has been adjudicated mentally defective or been committed to a mental institution from owning or possessing a firearm until certain relief is obtained...

Valid concerns, it seems to me, especially since Trump supporters are known to be mentally defective deplorables.

In liberalism/socialism's shifting sands, what we think is reasonable ("due process" "adjudicated mentally defective") is gonna be my next door neighbor or ME down the road.

"committed to a mental institution" -- could be argued to include a hospitalization for, say, post-partum depression in the past.

15 posted on 03/17/2018 7:25:53 AM PDT by cyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson