Posted on 03/22/2018 8:21:10 AM PDT by rktman
>
Why didn’t they attach National Reciprocity to this bill instead?
>
Because the 2nd makes that unnecessary\moot.
Follow, enforce and defend the Constitution and 90% of the Nation’s ‘problem(s)’ disappear.
Yes I understand that, but try explaining that to the prosecutors and the judges New Jersey, New York, and California. Try explaining that to the police as they arrest you. There are people that have done years in prison for processing a concealed handgun, where their license is recognized in 80% of the other states. There are people who have had their lives destroyed for having a magazine over 10 rounds. We need National Reciprocity.
Because states like Jersey, York, Illinois, and California will simply ignore that declaration. And the Supreme Court refuses to hear 2nd Amendment cases these days - we need national reciprocity.
An alternative to some of your prediction: The US descends into anarchy after Trump is removed with widespread violence on both sides with many casualties and hostile countries insert operatives and troops to carve up the US.
>
There are people who have had their lives destroyed for having a magazine over 10 rounds. We need National Reciprocity.
>
Sounds like we need more lawyers\judges (I repeat myself) and govt employees JAILED for deprivation of Rights under color of Law.
If ‘shall not be infringed’ is too hard to fathom, what makes you/anyone think adding MORE verbosity will clarify the point?
The problem(s), IMO, *are* the vagueness these charlatans code into ‘law’. The problem w/ the 2nd is they don’t care to read/apply as it is written (even historically so).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
