California is in open rebellion with the rest of the United States. The California government is openly defying federal law, the US Constitution, and has become a direct threat to the other US states. The California government has also been actively cooperating with and colluding with the mexican government to undermine US Constitutional authority to the detriment of the rest of the US states.
The next mexican-american war will be fought in California.
West Virginia became a separate state, as a result of Virginia declaring secession for the US.
In 1859 California passed the Pico Act, requesting that Southern California be split off as a separate state. The governor signed the bill, and 75 percent of voters in Southern California voted for it as a referendum. Congress needed to approve the split. Because of the secession of Southern States, Congress did not vote on it.
Bring back California’s Pico Act, and declare that since Congress failed to vote on California’s wishes in 1859, Congress will now take up the Pico Act.
In the process, declare that since California has voted to ignore Federal Immigration Laws, and declared that anyone cooperating in the implementation of Federal Immigration laws will be arrested, the Legislature of the state of California is now in rebellion.
Amend the original Pico Act and use the amended version to split California up into multiple states, to include the State of Jefferson in Northern California.
Obama had no problem declaring that Arizona could not, on its own, enforce Federal Immigration law, and Arizona was ruled in violation of the Supremacy Clause.
So isn’t it true that California is in violation, since it refuses to enforce Federal Law, or cooperate with ICE in fulfilling their obligations under law?
Is not the state of California Legislature in rebellion?
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.How much does it take to hoist libs on what is normally their favorite part of the constitution, the 14th? Seems to me that the City of Oakland doesn't have anyone "holding" the office of Mayor. Seems to me that a pack of other California offices also have gone vacant. Seems to me the votes of some Senators and Congresscritters shouldn't be counted any more than those of the illegals they defend. Seems to me that if any judges, including those of the 9th Circus or even wise Latinas say otherwise that President Trump should have more vacancies to fill. Maybe, politically, the time isn't quite right to pull the 14th trigger. But when the other side is eager to speak of succession and rebellion our side should be willing to point out that such tactics have been tried and failed in the past and that laws, including a constitutional amendment, were made specifically to prevent them in the future. Said laws don't say anything limiting them to ancient historical rebellions.
"14th Amendment, Section 3" fits easily within the space limits of a tweet with plenty of room left for Trumpian embellishments! Getting folks to dig out a copy of the Constitution and read it is ALWAYS a good thing. Go for it, Mr. President!
Oh ,and by the way, Section 5 says: "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." So the rebels can be removed, by action of the present simple majorities. Lincoln's Republicans would have done it! I wish ours were as "Radical."