Has anyone ever see a gun get up by itself and start murdering people?
Universal background checks is propaganda speak for registration.
No.
The fake news machine is in overdrive.
PARVEZ AHMED
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, Ahmed, we do still need the Second Amendment.
Since you posted 2 anti-gun articles and had nothing to say, is one to take it that you agree with this clap-trap BS?
Liberal insanity at it’s best.....they need to be put back in mental institutions before they hurt themselves...or worse, others.
Where do you get this “we” sh*t,Ahmed. If you can’t handle the Bill of Rights, take your goat smelling @$$ home. Since we’re going to do “recent” polls, how about the new poll conducted by NBC/WSJ where 58% of those polled said that Americans should have the right to own guns and be armed to defend themselves and their families. Only 38% thought the Nazis should be allowed to confiscate our guns. Stop telling just half of the story, MORON!
#FakeFacts. Quite the propaganda piece.
Ah, Mr Ahmed, Don’t think I care to read your thoughts on gun-control or lack thereof. I’m guessing what you would wish for.
“...assault weapons, like AR-15s...”
Of course, the AR15 is not an assault weapon.
The fully auto M16, its big brother, is.
Stop trying to make “97 percent” happen, MSM. No deal. I was not polled, nor was anyone I know.
Natural rights are never obsolete. The Constitution just acknowledged their need for protection through law. Those of us who know what’s important for America, know that any infringement of our 2nd Amendment is a crime against America. We will be taking names of the criminals against our Constitution and kicking asses.
Infringed: verb (used without object), infringed, infringing. To encroach or trespass (usually followed by on or upon): Don’t infringe on his privacy.
Synonyms:
breach
contraven
disobey
encroach
imposes
intrude
meddle
offend
trespass
borrow
break
crash
entrench
infract
invade
lift
obtrude
pirate
presume
steal
transgress
what we need is a government that will obey, abide by our republic’s constitution
Let me tell you something you forgot to say, Spanky. The "shooter" was one of those Parkland H.S. "students". The problem is NOT guns or the NRA, MORON. The "students" and their crappy public schools are the problem.
If we ever finally decide to overthrow all you commie progs, damn right we need it.
Marx talked about needs and groups, America is about what makes the -individual- happy.
Here’s a history of what happens after governments have disarmed their citizens:
1911 – Turkey disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.
1929 – Russia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.
1935 – China disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.
1938 – Germany disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 16 million Jews.
1956 – Cambodia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.
1964 – Guatamala disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.
1970 – Uganda disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.
[Editor: You can argue about the numbers, but the point here is that disarmed citizens are vulnerable, and that there are many historical examples of disarmed citizens being killed and oppressed by their own government. The excuse given by authorities that they need to take guns away from citizens in order to lower crime rates is not supported by facts. Even if a government does not turn on its own citizens after disarming them, people are less safe – because unarmed citizens are easy targets to criminals. Over and over again, it has been clearly shown that taking guns away from citizens does not lead to a decrease in crime but rather a dramatic increase.]
Australia has disarmed it’s citizens, and a year later the homicide rate in the largest province is up 300%. The burglaries of seniors is “dramatically” up.
I guess the criminals did not turn their weapons in. Only the innocent law abiding citizens turned in weapons.
In US cities with the highest crime rates, taking guns away from the citizens has not lowered the homicide rate. All it has done is to make it easier for criminals to operate.
The 2nd amendment is not about duck hunting, or deer hunting. It is about having the ability and the right to defend oneself and your family. It doesn’t matter if that threat is a burglar, or the Federal Government. A disarmed population is fair game for any president who may be aspiring to become a dictator. Having its citizens armed was the plain and simple intent of the founding fathers of our country.
I hate that term, “assault weapon.” It’s a BS term, a propaganda term, that does not actually define any real-world type of gun. A slingshot or a rock or a baseball bat or a bookend or a rolling pin can be an “assault weapon.”
Hey Ahmed. Some of my ancestors shouldered their own rifles and fired on the British in the mid 1770s. I tend to doubt that any of yours did.
America wouldn’t BE a nation if those farmers, tradesmen, and shop keepers didn’t personally own the implements to resist tyranny.
Like King George III before you, you gun grabbing commies don’t know what you’re messing with. You want to bring back the ‘spirit of ‘76, just try to disarm us. Guarantee, the result will be just like it was the last time.
Hey, Ahmed;
If you want to be able to use the First, then, Yeah, we need the Second.