[Lurkina.n.Learnin]

“California’s ‘proud legacy’ of ‘forward thinking’ in promoting ‘reproductive freedom”

Eugenics?

[I want the USA back]

It has no right to, but it does, thus invalidating the First Amendment.

[Innovative]

Communist governments did it — tow the line, or off to the prisoner labor camps.

[KC_Lion]

Should they?

No.

Can they?

YES!

[ClearCase_guy]

Canada is trying to legislatively force people to use new pronouns for transgenders. Jordan Peterson has a few choice things to say about this which can be summed up as: I'M NOT DOING IT AND THAT'S THAT.

[P.O.E.]

[Pollster1]

Compulsory speech contrary to your beliefs is as easy as baking a cake.

[1FreeAmerican]

Does work the other way around? Do pro abortion centers have to list/offer other options to pro life centers?

[eyeamok]

I have a better question:

Can Government Force you to engage in a “Criminal Conspiracy” under the Threat of Criminal andor Civil charges??

If the answer is NO, then shouldn’t I be entitled to an Immediate and Permanent injunction from All Taxes on Income, Tips, Wages and Property, since they are Forcing me to Finance this Criminal Conspiracy to violate Federal Immigration Law???

If I refuse to participate in this Criminal Conspiracy they will Arrest me and Take my stuff. How is that Legal??

[Architect of Avalon]

There is no Constitutional basis for trying to force Right to Life people to promote abortion.

[FreedomPoster]

Jordan Peterson
The Queen’s University Talk: The Rising Tide of Compelled Speech
https://youtu.be/MwdYpMS8s28

[familyop]

"Can Government Force You To Speak Contrary To Your Beliefs?"

Yes, and corporations do it, too. So do neighborhood gossips. Many men have been taught that lesson over the past 40 years. If you say what the political class doesn't like, you don't eat.

[MayflowerMadam]

Every single day.

[Jacquerie]

The Scotus regards abortion as a fundamental right.

No kidding.

A state that infringes on this fundamental right must explain why.

Freedom of religion, speech and press are mere “liberty interests” and not fundamental. A state may infringe on liberty interests if it can show a compelling interest.

No kidding.

[Secret Agent Man]

Freedom of Spech means being able to determine when and what to speak. Or to stay silent.

[Elsie]

This law is intended to further beat down pro-life advocates.

---

 

I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died. 

 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)

 

 

But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,

and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)

 

 

 

 

 

 

What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing

of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans.  Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.

Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.

 

 

I hear that by now, somewhere around 58 MILLION of them have perished.

Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and

retirement?

 

 

 

 

 

Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens.  Perhaps they'll come to their senses

before they are ALL dead!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died. 

 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)

 

 

But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,

and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)

 

 

 

 

 

 

What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing

of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans.  Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.

Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.

 

 

I hear that by now, somewhere around 58 MILLION of them have perished.

Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and

retirement?

 

 

 

 

 

Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens.  Perhaps they'll come to their senses

before they are ALL dead!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[GingisK]

No. But, you sometimes must be willing to suffer repercussions. Its that “Pick up your cross...” bullshit.

[Elsie]

At issue is a California statute that compels pro-life pregnancy centers to advertise the state’s pro-abortion alternative, informing women who come in for help, “California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to abortion for eligible women. To determine if you qualify, call [phone number].”

Works for me; as long as they can add after the message...

You will be taken into a small room where your yet unborn child will be sucked from your body with a powerful vacuum; ripping it apart in the process.

See this picture?

This is what the "unwanted tissue", now living and growing in your body, will look like in the trash bucket it ends up in.

[fella]

Under duress government can force you to say and/or write anything but making you think it is an other story.

[redgolum]

Simply put, yes.

For the last 50 years or so, the State can compel you to act and speak outside of your personal beliefs.