This timely article, circles back to the "original crime": The purported hack of the DNC servers by the Russians!!
This story line is based only on the word of the supposed victims and has never been investigated according to procedures that would be normally followed.
Hum, is someone hiding something or trying to create a fake narrative?
Mueller is a ‘Rat Hack of the First
Order...
Mueller, Comey and RosenWeasel are a Seditionist RICO Conspiracy buncha colluders to GET TRUMP!
Mueller’s primary purpose is to never finish his investigation because he is up to his eyeballs in the corruption of the DoJ and FBI; and he was one of the major actors in the Uranium One deal. That was treason and he could easily be sentenced to death, along with several others.
All the people he hired for his investigation are likely at risk for prosecution for corruption, sedition. and treason.
And why is no one asking for notes about the Mueller-Comey meeting just before Comey testilied the last time he was before Congress? They were planning their strategy to cover up their crimes.
It was a leak, his name was Seth Rich.
He was murdered.
Investigate THAT!
Mueller is a crooked cop who is on a kamikaze mission for the deep state.
He’s making an ass of himself and destroying his reputation for history, but he doesn’t seem to care.
The answer is is that Mueller’s purpose is both to create a cover up and to utilize the method of creating multiple false narratives for that very purpose. And that is the reason why Mueller is not investigating anything except for Phantoms and insinuation-based accusations. He’s not investigating anything that could lead to logical conclusions, it is all based upon fourth grade playground dirtbomb Wars.
Yes of course, if by the Russians you mean Seth rich, and if by hacked you mean downloaded to a thumb drive (by Seth rich).
Why would mueller be looking into that? His mission is to bring down trump and cover up the high crimes hillary and obama committed.
The russians didn’t interfere with the election, the demoncrats did.
Does he have any corroboration of this by anyone other than Pinocchio?
From The Nation article mentioned in this piece:
” Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:
•There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.
•Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
Yes. You would think this vital not just to Mueller but to national security in general. The DNC claimed Russia hacked them, a major political party. The FBI needs to determine if a hack really occurred, and if so who may have done it, and rule out any insiders who may have cooperated with the hackers.
Of course most sensible people think there was no hack, just a leak. But the DNC made the allegation, so it needs to be followed up. It may be their right to deny FBI access, but how is it politically acceptable for them to deny a federal investigation of foreign espionage that they themselves allege to have happened? It’s absurd the media allows them to get away with this.
Here is a refresher article about the monkey business with the DNC server
http://www.wnd.com/2017/12/only-1-reason-dnc-destroyed-server-says-u-s-intel-expert/
Nope, it wasn’t. Crowdstrike went in and took care of a all the evidence in one weekend.
Leaked Texts Suggest Coordination Between Obama White House, CIA, FBI And Dems To Launch Trump-Russia Probe
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Thu, 03/29/2018 - 10:23
0
SHARES
Congressional investigators looking into the origins of Special Counsel Mueller’s Russia probe believe they’ve found a smoking gun that could justify the appointment of a special counsel to investigate whether the Obama administration exerted undue influence over the FBI.
A series of text messages between FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ lawyer Lisa Page have revealed the involvement of Denis McDonough, Obama’s chief of staff, John Brennan, Obama’s CIA director, and former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in helping create an atmosphere of paranoia that gave them the political cover to launch the Russia probe back in the summer of 2016.
McDonough
Denis McDonough
The investigators who leaked the information to Fox said the texts between Strzok and Page “strongly” suggest coordination between the White House, two independent intelligence agencies, and a Democratic Congressional leader. That would “contradict” the Obama administration’s claims of non-involvement.
The texts tell of former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe being concerned with “information control,” and suggest a plot to leak details of the FBI’s incipient investigation to both the White House and Reid. Brennan also became involved in agitating for an investigation, though his agency was supposed to be operationally separate from the FBI.
Page texted Strzok on Aug. 2, 2016, saying: “Make sure you can lawfully protect what you sign. Just thinking about congress, foia, etc. You probably know better than me.”
A text message from Strzok to Page on Aug. 3 described former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe as being concerned with “information control” related to the initial investigation into the Trump campaign. According to a report from the New York Times, Brennan was sent to Capitol Hill around the same time to brief members of Congress on the possibility of election interference.
Days later, on Aug. 8, 2016, Strzok texted Page: “Internal joint cyber cd intel piece for D, scenesetter for McDonough brief, Trainor [head of FBI cyber division] directed all cyber info be pulled. I’d let Bill and Jim hammer it out first, though it would be best for D to have it before the Wed WH session.”
In the texts, “D” referred to FBI Director James Comey, and and “McDonough” referred to Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, the GOP investigators said.
One of Fox’s sources said the information was “concerning” enough to justify launching an independent probe into the FBI’s role in launching the Trump investigation.
“We are not making conclusions. What we are saying is that the timeline is concerning enough to warrant the appointment of an independent investigator to look at whether or not the Obama White House was involved [in the Trump-Russia investigation],” a GOP congressional source told Fox News.
Naturally, coordination between political appointees at the White House and DOJ investigators would cast doubt on the entire Russia probe, Fox’s sources said.
The following day, Aug. 30, 2016, Strzok texted Page: “Here we go,” sending a link to the Times report titled, “Harry Reid Cites Evidence of Russian Tampering in U.S. Vote and seeks FBI inquiry.”
The texts also detail the Bureau and Brennan’s role in feeding information to Reid, which inspired him to write a letter to the FBI demanding an investigation be launched. That letter was later leaked to the press. The Reid letter, Fox said, provided political cover for the bureau when it tried to justify launching an investigation into Trump as early as July 2016.
In other words, the FBI was well-versed in how to strategically use “leaks” to manage information control and wash its hands over any potential collusion allegations... with the exception of course of the texts that reveal how the plot was hatched in the first place.
The question now is whether McCabe, who was fired two weeks ago, will be called in to testify on these stark allegations.
One thing is for certain: The texts provide the clearest sign yet into the Obama administration’s role in helping get the Russia probe off the ground in an attempt to roadblock Trump’s administration, all the while Obama chose to do nothing about reports of Russian attempts at election interference.
We imagine we’ll hear more about this in the coming days.
The lack of interest by Mueller in the DNC server is the biggest tell of all that Mueller is a corrupt hack whose primary goal is to harass Trump and cover-up for the 0bama administration FBI and DOJ.