The only problem I ever have with CIA is methodology. Too many of them like to lie right off the bat with anyone they are talking to, then tell them the truth later, if ever.
The best agents never lie and never have to make up a story afterwards. There are many ways to protect yourself without lying.
However, in many of the third world countries, once you have lied, you are always a liar, no matter what. They might smile in your face while the money is flowing, but you are never their friend and you are never trusted.
Gina Haspel reveled as a very interesting lady. (I think you’d like her.)
The ultimate insider running CIA right now? Not sure about that.
A Kentuckian.
This is an insight? I would say it is fundamental. There are always risks. You cannot avoid risks. It's just a fact: you will be taking risks in any endeavor. So the key skill is always managing the risks effectively. That's why they call it Risk Management and not Risk Avoidance.
From the reactions of the pantywaist codell-the-terrorists crowd, she’s obviously a great choice. Go Gina!
.......the article, near the end, starts talking about how “Gina” is good for the CIA because she brings “Diversity” to the agency.
This is the same kind of PCBS mentality that is pervasive in every federal agency and that is sooooo wrong.
The CIA needs the smartest, toughest, most patriotic person available. “Diversity” should not even be a consideration.