Posted on 03/30/2018 7:34:48 AM PDT by GIdget2004
Send her back to whatever backwards Mohammedan hellhole she came from.
“Lots of people on juries are stupid and cowardly and will not return a guilty verdict unless they have 100% proof that someone is guilty.”
Yes, jurors understand that the prosecution must prove their case.
Not guilty.....just like OJ and Casey Anthony.
Well except the ones molested by Bill. Those women are floozies.
I'd like to see a photograph and then names of the jurors.
Muzzoids & Meheecans are protected species.
Expect her lawsuit to be started any day. CAIR will see to that.
And Katherine Russell (Tsarnaev)
I thought that was the plan.
“Send her back to whatever backwards Mohammedan hellhole she came from.”
**************************************************
LOL — I think that may be California; she was born in the US.
Recall that the media and the DNC government spun this, heavily, as NOT a terrorist incident but as a lone gunmen wanting to shoot up teh gayz.
Keeping with that meme - it’s not hard to see how a jury would acquit his wife who knew nothing about this wild eyed homophobic murderer (and not an assist of Islamic Terrorism)
Is the verdict wrong? Hard to say - I’d blame the prosecution first.
No doubt quaking in fear the whole time/sarc.
When a Muslim man embraces radical Islam people need to look at the wife or girlfriend in his life as one of the roots of that radicalization. Especially if the woman has family overseas or has been there herself recently. Even if she was born here or is a citizen of long standing. Look to the woman. Why? Because she is the one most likely to be swayed by appeals to emotion.
In turn she will do what she can to convince her husband or boyfriend that her new understanding of the “enemies” of her home nation require a new understanding of Islam and the actions arising from that.
So, I feel in my heart that she was very much guilty.
I believe the the government purposely lost the case.
As soon as she brought out the fact that the father was a paid FBI informant and that the FBI was working directly to recruit her husband the shooter the government deliberately lost the case.
She was going to make public more information on the corrupt and politicized Obama FBI.
The corrupt FIB and DOJ do not want to arrest or imprison any Muslim terrorists period. It is as simple as that.
They will always help them avoid prosecution.
With that said, I have not been following this particular case very closely and I am not in a position to second-guess the jury. So I won't.
Close enough...
‘-)
Or they simply were a bunch of lib jurors and decided to ignore the evidence.
It would be great if cases were always open and shut, but they seldom are. Juries are presented with evidence, and are supposed to reach a judgment. Many now expect to be presented with a case in which the verdict is so obvious they will not suffer any pangs of regret for voting guilty. Judging by your reply to my original post, and many others in this thread, the jury was correct to not find O.J. guilty because they did not have 100% proof that he did it. No one saw him do it, and it wasn't caught on camera.
Your satire is most appreciated and did not require a /s tag.
But there are libtards out there, many in authority, who would utter that manifesto with dead seriousness and insist that it didn’t go far enough.
“Truth is always stranger than fiction.”
Deport her anyway.
She threatened to show the links between her husband and father in law and the FBI
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.