To: familyop
If an individual is too dangerous to possess a fire arm, they are too dangerous to be at large, and must therefore be committed...
9 posted on
04/02/2018 8:03:47 PM PDT by
SecondAmendment
(Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
To: SecondAmendment
Bingo, if we take their rights without due process, then why can they keep privileges and run for office?
That big “gun show” loophole that elects people to wield the police state while they are not allowed to own guns strike me as breeding puppets of the deep state
11 posted on
04/02/2018 8:10:29 PM PDT by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
To: SecondAmendment
"If an individual is too dangerous to possess a fire arm, they are too dangerous to be at large, and must therefore be committed..."
That's the remedy. Too often, their reluctance to use it is revealing, isn't it. They expect those of us with the least resources to continue taking care of the burned out freaks in our neighborhoods, including the aging, schizophrenic hippie trust fund babies from their neighborhoods.
16 posted on
04/02/2018 8:56:45 PM PDT by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson