To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ok for them to spy on you. Not upset when they put them out to invade your privacy.
2 posted on
04/03/2018 12:53:23 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
They aren’t cheap but I used to work at a company that had a bunch of them. We used them to test phones.
3 posted on
04/03/2018 12:53:35 PM PDT by
jrestrepo
(See you all in Galt's gulch)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“rogue devices”. Sure, it’s not like the NSA, FBI or CIA would be spying on politicians.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The wireless carriers are complicit in the use of Sting Rays. Every time one of them is fired up their Network Operations Centers instantly detect it.
Operation of a Sting Ray directly violates two provisions of the Communications Act of 1934 that have NO law enforcement exemptions.
This is why the Feds give these toys to local PDs who use them as directed and why they will let a court case be dismissed rather than reveal what they are actually doing. How the .gov gets away with this defies rational explanation.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I found THREE of them in SPOKANE COUNTY.
10 posted on
04/03/2018 1:38:39 PM PDT by
BullDog108
(.A Smith & Wesson beats four aces!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
12 posted on
04/03/2018 1:40:38 PM PDT by
BullDog108
(.A Smith & Wesson beats four aces!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
14 posted on
04/03/2018 1:41:22 PM PDT by
Big Red Badger
(UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What, the feds don’t like the competition?
17 posted on
04/03/2018 3:37:54 PM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer; ransomnote; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...
19 posted on
04/03/2018 6:41:35 PM PDT by
bitt
(The first to squeal gets the best deal.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
22 posted on
04/04/2018 3:07:46 AM PDT by
BullDog108
(.A Smith & Wesson beats four aces!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson