Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timmy; All
So true. FTA:

The president and some of his allies seized on the special counsel's words as an assurance that Trump's risk of criminal jeopardy is low. Other advisers, however, noted that subjects of investigations can easily become indicted targets - and expressed concern that the special prosecutor was baiting Trump into an interview that could put the president in greater legal peril.

The layman's translation of all of this is they haven't found a damn thing they can criminally charge our PRESIDENT Trump with, but they want to interview him to try to manufacture a process crime under the False Statements Act. He should to tell them to perform a physiological impossibility on themselves. The Constitution requires a "high crime or misdemeanor" for impeachment and they've just admitted they don't have the evidence to even hope to prove it.

18 posted on 04/03/2018 8:37:50 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: libstripper

Thank you. Bears repeating:

The Constitution requires a “high crime or misdemeanor” for impeachment and they’ve just admitted they don’t have the evidence to even hope to prove it.


23 posted on 04/03/2018 9:18:29 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson