Posted on 04/04/2018 12:12:31 PM PDT by Hojczyk
1. An exoneration letter is drafted in advance.
2. Immunity is given to top Trump aides (and they’re allowed to sit in on interview). (Continued)
3. Interview isn’t recorded.
4. Lead official (Mueller) doesn’t attend.
5. #2 official’s family has received large donations from Trump political friends. 6. Prior to the interview, lead official meets privately on plane tarmac with Trump's wife (to discuss grandchildren). (Cont)
7. Main interviewer has expressed disdain for Trump’s opponents, such as discussing an “insurance plan” with higher-ups to undermine them. If the same terms aren’t offered...Was Clinton’s interview process unfair? Or is the one proposed for Trump unfair? #FairIsFair
8. As long as they believe Trump didn't intend any harm, he's let off the hook for any violations.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
A Trump interview with special counsel...should never happen. It will only lend legitimacy to Mueller. No upside on that idea.
I like it
Sheryl’s correct under those conditions I think should have a sit down
9) no notes are taken in the interview
Love it.
bkmk
First he sees all the questions and then he decides if he wants to meet with the special time and money waster.
Don't do it Mr. President. You're a smart man and have seen how Mueller used misstatements to prosecute others.
Sheesh, an old nobody like me knows to NEVER talk directly to the police, detective, or prosecutor.
Mr. President, if you have the need to be transparent, then have your attorney ask Mueller for specific written questions. You and your lead attorney will have time to figure out the best short truthful answers in a way Mueller can't come back and get you for lying to a federal investigator.
1.Don’t trust them and never do it
2.Don’t trust them and never do it
3.Don’t trust them and never do it
Unfortunately, Mueller’s legitimacy is a fait accompli much like Obama’s presidency.
Sheryl’s plan makes sense; however, I have argued for months for several modifications.
The “interview” ought to be televised nationally and Trump should trade questions with Mueller. Whether Mueller answers Trump’s questions, the questions should be designed to raise issues regarding Mueller’s partiality and bias, his lack of focus, any suspected criminal actions, ineffective management of his investigator’s/legal team, etc. All of which will provide the public with a basis for understanding why Mueller gets fired.
As an attorney who is very aware of his missteps and legal exposure, Mueller should damn well refuse such a sitdown; in which case, Trump ought to fire him for being an ineffective SC and wasting taxpayer funds.
Omelette meeting
I love this woman.
Brilliant....reverse their roles....Trump gets to kick Mueller's behind. See how he likes it.
Excellent!
I know Sheryl is being facetious, but under no circumstances should Trump agree to anything from Mueller.
She makes great points, but the FBI "interview" of Hillary was a complete sham.
It was simply a tea party, with cookies and watercress sandwiches, where they discussed how much they agree on everything.
They probably hugged at the end, with the FBI apologizing for wasting Hillary's valuable time.
10) After the meeting, the FBI allows Trump to smash all of his cell phones and computers with a hammer.
I think Trump should meet face to face with Mueller. They should sit across from each other at a table with all their lawyers and Trump should lean forward and say “YOU’RE FIRED”!...’Now bring in Rosenstein, Sessions and Wray, they’re next’.
NO, or reap the consequences. There is ZERO upside. Underestimating the enemy is pure trouble. Just assume that impeachment and Obstruction is a fait accompli.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.