Of course we should have zero tolerance for this, without question. If people want to apply for political asylum, by all means support this, and legitimately review their cases. If granted asylum they MUST renounce their citizenship from their country of origin. Democrats who oppose this are without question subversives.
If people cross from Mexico, where they ahve been given permission to be, and ask for asylum, fine, help them fill out the paperwork, then send them back to Mexico to wait for their hearing. They can then go the consult or embassy, else to a border station for that hearing. But NEVER let them into the US until a hearing approves it. And 99.9 % should be NO, since as they are in Mexico, they have no immediate fear of persecution. Send Mexico a thank you note for taking them in.
No. That’s not good enough. We do *not* need to take in every frickin ‘asylum seeker’ whether they’re willing to mouth the words of renunciation or not. We’re welcoming terrorists and other violent felons in with fruit baskets and extra welfare benefits. It’s national suicide.
The whole asylum seeking for refugees from Muslim countries scheme was supposed to be aimed at rescuing persecuted *Christians*, not islamists.
Zero tolerance...If schools can adopt “zero tolerance” against children eating snack Pop Tart shaped pistols, the US military should exercise the same against ILLEGAL ALIEN border crossers and drug cartel mules.
We should not accept asylum applicants that have set foot in a different country before they arrive here.
Asylum applicants must be compelled to apply for asylum in the first safe country they set foot in, as per the convention the rest of the world adheres to.