There is no amount of legal research that you can possibly do that would replace the results of a single well-designed clinical trial. Or of any scientific research, for that matter. Lawyers are not medical researchers.
This is not to say that lawyers and researchers cannot work together. We do work with a legal team that is quite knowledgeable about things like intellectual property, human subject protection, and so forth. But they cannot do what we do, any more than we can do what they do.
You can’t argue it to a legal standard. Yes, the analysis would be different between a scientist and a lawyer, but both are valid. Yes, the lawyers would have to work with experts.
Lawyers can teach themselves anything and we do all the time, and we work with experts and we know how to present the results of a clinical trial to a court. Keep in mind, there is nothing that trumps a court order. If people need relief, they get it from a court.