Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wall Street is overreacting to Trump’s tariffs on China
New York Post ^ | 04/09/2018 | Jonathan Trugman

Posted on 04/09/2018 8:00:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Every once in a while, Wall Street has a fit.

Sometimes it is warranted, many times it is not. The tariff tantrum falls under into the latter category.

Late Thursday night, President Trump upped the ante in the tariff game, proposing a review of an additional $100 billion of potential tariffs.

So the US and China, the two largest economies, jostle over a tiny percentage of their multitrillion-dollar GDPs to make a point — and to score points.

But Wall Street uses its finest calculus, egged on by Trump-bashing media personalities dressed up as “journalists,” to extrapolate that we are in an “all-out trade war.”

What is so baffling about the tariff tantrum is that it was an issue on which the president campaigned.

There’s not an economist with a shred of credibility who thinks the US gets treated fairly by China, especially when it comes to intellectual property.

Wall Street is chock-full of pseudo-intellectuals who went to good schools and got good grades. But the vast majority lack the ability to think critically, especially at critical moments.

Remember when the markets were going to go to hell if Gary Cohn ever left the White House? Well, Cohn had a disagreement with the president and resigned over the proposed tariffs, and the markets were just fine.

The second-biggest overhyped myth on the planet is that “China could sell our bonds.” Please do, China, and rip that Band-Aid off quickly.

China’s stake is one day of trading volume. That’s it.

I get that many journalists have a different political persuasion than Trump, but numerous presidents have had trade disputes. President Obama slapped a 35 percent tariff on Chinese automobile and light truck tires.

He wasn’t vilified, he was “sticking up for the worker.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; tariffs; wallstreet

1 posted on 04/09/2018 8:00:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wall Street is Pro-China and Anti-Trump


2 posted on 04/09/2018 8:02:01 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That means the dip is a buying opportunity.


3 posted on 04/09/2018 8:06:44 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wall Street is overreacting to Trump’s tariffs on China

Currently, there are NO TARIFFS, only PROPOSED TARIFFS.

4 posted on 04/09/2018 8:06:51 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Strzok and Page - The very definition of SEDITION and TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Trump is a master at negotiations. How does he do it? I am going to make up a made up thing here to demonstrate what I mean.

Trump: We need to really go after China. They have been smashing our faces in the dirt for years. We gotta stop that. We needs tariffs. We need to bloody their noses.

What does China do? They think the absolute worst. They get a little nervous. They think that Trump will do everything they are fearing.

Trump: We are going to go after aluminum and steel.

And China goes - "Whew! He's not going to go after EVERYTHING. Whew!

Meanwhile, the lamestreamers have get their panties in a wad and Trump combs his hair.

5 posted on 04/09/2018 8:07:28 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think a lot of these market swings are caused by big fund managers all selling off when the market peaks and then buying back in at the market lows.


6 posted on 04/09/2018 8:07:52 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Don’t forget computer algorithms, they are mostly responsible for the huge swings in the market.


7 posted on 04/09/2018 8:08:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
Wall Street is Pro-China and Anti-Trump

That's because the following, from the article, is true: "Wall Street is chock-full of pseudo-intellectuals who went to good schools and got good grades. But the vast majority lack the ability to think critically, especially at critical moments."

The same is generally true of those in government and in academia.

8 posted on 04/09/2018 8:08:47 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

RE: Currently, there are NO TARIFFS, only PROPOSED TARIFFS.

And that’s the problem — traders/markets are FORWARD LOOKING.


9 posted on 04/09/2018 8:09:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

True of people in general, but applies especially to Govt and academics, who have no experience in reality.


10 posted on 04/09/2018 8:10:14 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The "oh no, this damages free trade!" folks are ignoring one key thing: China does not engage in free trade. They push their stuff to us while they refuse to open their markets to our stuff. For 25 years I've watched as politicians kissed Chinese butts at the behest of the money people who hoped that market would open up because they thought we were swell. That market is behind an iron wall, it's a mirage and it's high time we stopped making policy around a fantasy. If we want true free trade than we need to let China know that it goes both ways or not at all. And then they can decide how they want it to be. The truth is they need our markets yet since theirs are and always have been closed we don't need them. That's the problem with a trade imbalance, when you don;t buy anything from someone your threats to stop buying things from them don't really have any teeth.

Yes in the short term their cheap junk and slave labor produced cheap electronics would be missed but we'd find other ways to get them. China would probably starve. Who needs who?

11 posted on 04/09/2018 8:17:41 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Russians couldnt have done a better job destroying sacred American institutions than Democrats have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The EU and China are overreacting.

They need to accept the US must have the ability to produce its own steel and aluminum, as WW2 proved.

The US wishes to have an industrial base, which is essential for a prosperous society.


12 posted on 04/09/2018 8:22:17 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma
Bingo

All of this theater is for generating money.

Win on the down side and win on the upside because these big companies are not going anywhere.

Who is told when the hysterical news is going to be triggered? Follow the money.

13 posted on 04/09/2018 8:23:21 AM PDT by GOPBiker (Thank a veteran, with a smile, every chance you get. You do more good than you can know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wall Street uses any excuse to manipulate the stock prices.
If it is cloudy on Tuesday the stocks may go down.


14 posted on 04/09/2018 8:58:44 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They’re holding a stampy-foot hissy fit. They are gonna hold their breath until they turn blue.

Ignore them. They can’t keep that up for long, you’ll see.


15 posted on 04/09/2018 9:02:31 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
President Trump gave just one example - wish he'd issue a LONG list.

Donald J. Trump ‏
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
"When a car is sent to the United States from China, there is a Tariff to be paid of 2 1/2%. When a car is sent to China from the United States, there is a Tariff to be paid of 25%. Does that sound like free or fair trade. No, it sounds like STUPID TRADE - going on for years!"

16 posted on 04/09/2018 9:24:58 AM PDT by Oatka (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bookmark


17 posted on 04/09/2018 9:58:37 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I said much the same today about a silly sky is falling article on World Oil.

This panic is silly. Wish i had a bunch of money to invest right now.


18 posted on 04/09/2018 5:16:21 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson