I’d just like to know how ‘we’ can know it is not a completely fake document, even if it says what many want it to say , and what they expected it to say?
That was my thought too. It would be prudent to suspect that the document is not completely genuine. And the redactions that DOJ insisted still be made after all this brinksmanship remind me of Susan Rice's memo to the file. An obvious sign of deception.
That being said, how does RR know the good guys don't already have the original?
Seeing how corrupt ‘our’ DOJ is, it’s a high probability that it is a fake.
They already requested it from the Judge who said to get it from DOJ. Now they can ask the Judge if it contains the same info.