Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right

If he voted it down because it’s too vague, that’s not so bad.


3 posted on 04/17/2018 10:11:20 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JudyinCanada

agree


21 posted on 04/17/2018 11:14:39 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JudyinCanada

We don’t want vague laws that can be interpreted to mean anything by anybody.

We have too much of that already.
Here in PA I can be cited for driving with an “excessive” amount of snow on my car. How much is “excessive”? The law doesn’t say. If the borough needs revenue it might be three flakes.


25 posted on 04/17/2018 11:38:05 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JudyinCanada

Agree.


32 posted on 04/17/2018 1:52:09 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JudyinCanada

That some POS illegal immigrant gets to stay here is no consideration?


36 posted on 04/17/2018 3:50:22 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson