I was never sure how you could strike a chemical weapons stockpile in a populated area without causing it to spread and kill nearby people anyway, I believe it was a message to let them know what’s next if it happens again
It’s been explained on almost every post since it happened.
Tucker Carlson interview with former UK Ambassador to Syria- the ambassador said the supposed chem weap sites hit, had been inspected and cleared in November last year. So.. maybe Trump/we knew there was nothing there- gave em a warning and we destroyed sites for something else. And we have the money to do this 105 times, pretty expensive... but a “signal” to both Assad and Russians that. we. could. flatten them quickly. And also to the 20K Iranian militia that are in Syria now, so a message to Iran.
A level of sophistication not seen in the prior run ups, and then there is “Linda” Graham’s “unnerved” info response- cause the intent to ramp this up full scale and waste the miliary rebuild money on stupid excursions was defused. One wonders. Maybe this is true— fake attack to respond to a faked chemical attack from the “moderate” we had been bankrolling - who are running out of dough. Pretty cagey.