Your comment reminded me of this infamous event. It would be nice to see how Hillary would handle (or mishandle) honest questions. She got one, ONE, from Matt Lauer and went ballistic.
“...she would have addressed her bawling followers that night and given a moving speech for the ages. But she didn’t, because she was sedated.”
Interesting theory on sedation. I’ll keep that in mind, though I don’t think the truth will ever be told as to what really went on. But have a chance of getting close to the truth of the matter, a different strategy is needed. When she shows up at book signings, conservative media members should show up, even if they have to pay, and just make up questions to see her reaction. The left does this all the time. Consider what they do to Trump - “We hear you have been irate and discussing in private that you want to fire Mueller next week. Is that true?” Of course the reporters never heard it, they just made up the question to see how he will react and respond, and to see if he is thinking about it.
HRC should be asked similarly about election night, like...”It is reported that you did not show up on election night because you passed out just like you did on 9/11/16 in NYC and had to be dragged to a safe place. Can you tell us why that happened election night, why it took you so long to make a concession speech, and did you have the same medical treatment to bring you back?” “Were you ever sedated on election night?” Even when she denies it, keep pressing her to describe exactly what she did that night and why. My guess is that her handlers would get the questioner removed. Having 15 or 20 people there doing this in sequence would be necessary to blunt the effectiveness of removing questioners, and then another story begins to take shape.
My theory is that when she lost, it was totally unexpected. Look at their outrage at Trump after the debate when he said he’ll get back to them on conceding if he lost the election. Their anger about Trump undermining democracy, etc etc .... (and not once has she ever been asked this question why her post-election behavior doesn’t undermine the same.) When there was no “Al Gore opportunity” available to give even a pretext of legitimacy to challenge the results, she/they had to begin thinking that their dirty dealing and criminal behavior in the primaries and general campaign and in the government would very likely be exposed once out of power in the next 2 months. They were shocked at the results and were panicked.
If Trump were not elected, none of this (and more) would ever come to light in at least a generation, if not longer.
For this I am thankful under the circumstances.