I don't see a pre-Salk decline at all.
The huge increase in the '50s was due to all the Baby-Boomers coming along.
Great Vaxxer bait. Comments should be rife with hypocrisy about Attkisson.
“According to Healy, when she began researching autism and vaccines she found credible published, peer-reviewed scientific studies that support the idea of an association. That seemed to counter what many of her colleagues had been saying for years. She dug a little deeper and was surprised to find that the government has not embarked upon some of the most basic research that could help answer the question of a link.
The more she dug, she says, the more she came to believe the government and medical establishment were intentionally avoiding the question because they were afraid of the answer.”
The fact is that Polio was on the decline before Salk came along...just one matter which clearly points to other factors for consideration.
Healy’s right: It’s a “sad open question.”
But don’t tell that to “vaxxers.”
“The fact is that Polio was on the decline before Salk came along...”
It certainly was not. Where on earth did you get that info?
.
Exactly...”But vaccines cured polio.” No. It did not. Wake the frick up, people!
The fact is that Polio was on the decline before Salk came along
Yes, yes it was because The 1952 U.S. epidemic (just before the 1955 introduction of the vaccine) was the worst outbreak in the nation’s history, MASSIVELY more than any other years outbreak. Just going back to normal looked like a decrease.