..............
"What the implosion of the Mueller investigation has revealed is the manufacture of evidential documents, the outright lies to courts like FISA and too many people having lied under oath, and perjury is still an offense, whether youre a liberal or not.
There are strong grounds to suspect AG sessions has impaneled at least two other grand juries hes keeping under wraps, but more importantly I wouldnt be at all surprised if covered warrants for various individuals are being drawn up.
Once you open up warfare on the legalities front, you in effect begin the construction of an intricate machine that on an almost daily basis becomes ever more complex. In the end, it has way too many moving parts for you to keep an eye on all of them. People can no longer just mouth off unsubstantiated rumors as facts; they have to restrict themselves to provable facts that can withstand a cross-examination. If you make up stuff, otherwise known as lying under oath, you open yourself up to legal punishment, as Bill Clinton found out when he was impeached for lying to Congress.
(take away the lefts ability to lie at will and they are through)
The latest effort of the DNC on the lawfare front is to sue Russia, Wikileaks and various people involved in the Trump campaign, but notably not Trump himself. Call me cynical, but interestingly, none of the supporting paperwork mentions any facts thrown up by a years worth of the Mueller shenanigans in support of the suits. It is of course madness, not only because theres no hope of winning any case against any of those parties, but even if a case could be brought to a successful conclusion, it would neither fill their severely depleted coffers with money nor would it roll back the election result of 2016.
(what you have is a bunch of cabal members all dutifully fulfilling their obligations to the cabal ever if it leads nowhere or in the wrong direction.this is what you get from people who believe in nothing,have no loyalties to anything but gold and will sell out anyone in a heartbeat)
Patently, theres no win there for them beyond trying to irritate various people, but there are several downsides to such a dumb move. Ill mention only one, since its already been mention by the Don himself on Twitter, and that is it introduces the legal complication of the discovery process. Essentially, that means I get the legal right to see the documents and evidence youre basing your accusation against me on, never mind getting sucked into the obvious move of a counter suit. You either have to hide the embarrassing internal documents, and risk legal punishment, or you have to hand them over to eventually appear in open court.
But thats not the big danger that goes with such a dumb move. Theyve learnt nothing from the Mueller débâcle, and if they persist along the legal Yellow Brick road, Trump will run exactly the same number on them as he did with Mueller, and make equally sure that road ends abruptly at a similar precipice. Of late, the DNC have that sweaty smell of hurried desperation about them, so I wouldnt put it past them to plough on with such a bad move.
Time will tell.
Whats beyond doubt though, is that theres only ever been one person manipulating the strings attached to various witting and unwitting puppets all the way through the hearings, and thats been Trump. What was originally intended to hurt him, has by design been reversed to end up hurting them badly. All in all, he played the Mueller investigation beautifully."
©Pointman Related articles by Pointman:
That wasn't the charge at all.
He was impeached on two counts:
Article I charged that Clinton lied to the grand jury in the Paula Jones civil suit (he was sworn under oath).
Article II was not approved by the House.
Article III charged Clinton with attempting to obstruct justice in the Jones case.
The Senate acquitted Clinton on both articles.