Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pugmama
Where in the world did you find this! It's awesome!! Here's the ending but everyone should read the entire piece its amazing!

..............

"What the implosion of the Mueller investigation has revealed is the manufacture of evidential documents, the outright lies to courts like FISA and too many people having lied under oath, and perjury is still an offense, whether you’re a liberal or not.

There are strong grounds to suspect AG sessions has impaneled at least two other grand juries he’s keeping under wraps, but more importantly I wouldn’t be at all surprised if covered warrants for various individuals are being drawn up.

Once you open up warfare on the legalities front, you in effect begin the construction of an intricate machine that on an almost daily basis becomes ever more complex. In the end, it has way too many moving parts for you to keep an eye on all of them. People can no longer just mouth off unsubstantiated rumors as facts; they have to restrict themselves to provable facts that can withstand a cross-examination. If you make up stuff, otherwise known as lying under oath, you open yourself up to legal punishment, as Bill Clinton found out when he was impeached for lying to Congress.

(take away the lefts ability to lie at will and they are through)

The latest effort of the DNC on the lawfare front is to sue Russia, Wikileaks and various people involved in the Trump campaign, but notably not Trump himself. Call me cynical, but interestingly, none of the supporting paperwork mentions any “facts” thrown up by a year’s worth of the Mueller shenanigans in support of the suits. It is of course madness, not only because there’s no hope of winning any case against any of those parties, but even if a case could be brought to a successful conclusion, it would neither fill their severely depleted coffers with money nor would it roll back the election result of 2016.

(what you have is a bunch of cabal members all dutifully fulfilling their obligations to the cabal ever if it leads nowhere or in the wrong direction.this is what you get from people who believe in nothing,have no loyalties to anything but gold and will sell out anyone in a heartbeat)

Patently, there’s no win there for them beyond trying to irritate various people, but there are several downsides to such a dumb move. I’ll mention only one, since it’s already been mention by the Don himself on Twitter, and that is it introduces the legal complication of the discovery process. Essentially, that means I get the legal right to see the documents and evidence you’re basing your accusation against me on, never mind getting sucked into the obvious move of a counter suit. You either have to hide the embarrassing internal documents, and risk legal punishment, or you have to hand them over to eventually appear in open court.

But that’s not the big danger that goes with such a dumb move. They’ve learnt nothing from the Mueller débâcle, and if they persist along the legal Yellow Brick road, Trump will run exactly the same number on them as he did with Mueller, and make equally sure that road ends abruptly at a similar precipice. Of late, the DNC have that sweaty smell of hurried desperation about them, so I wouldn’t put it past them to plough on with such a bad move.

Time will tell.

What’s beyond doubt though, is that there’s only ever been one person manipulating the strings attached to various witting and unwitting puppets all the way through the hearings, and that’s been Trump. What was originally intended to hurt him, has by design been reversed to end up hurting them badly. All in all, he played the Mueller investigation beautifully."

©Pointman Related articles by Pointman:

314 posted on 05/05/2018 12:41:21 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the free because of the brave! MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: rodguy911
...as Bill Clinton found out when he was impeached for lying to Congress.

That wasn't the charge at all.

He was impeached on two counts:

Article I charged that Clinton lied to the grand jury in the Paula Jones civil suit (he was sworn under oath).
Article II was not approved by the House.
Article III charged Clinton with attempting to obstruct justice in the Jones case.

The Senate acquitted Clinton on both articles.

322 posted on 05/05/2018 2:45:20 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (If white privilege is real, why do we have millions of poor white people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson