Posted on 05/04/2018 6:38:44 AM PDT by bitt
A Republican lawmaker contends the prosecutor has a lot to explain about his present job and prior posts as well
by Rep. Louie Gohmert | Updated 04 May 2018 at 7:49 AM
A firestorm was ignited earlier this week when The New York Times published a list of 40 questions that special counsel Robert Mueller allegedly wants President Donald J. Trump to answer under oath.
It is a revealing list of questions, proving that after a year of strong-arming Trump family and friends, bankrupting Trump campaign volunteers and former staff, and leaking like a sieve, Mueller has found no evidence of any crime by the president whatsoever.
But since Mueller has wasted millions of tax dollars and endless hours of Trump’s time, it’s time for the special counsel to answer some questions. Let’s start with a few on the present runaway railroading of the president, then a look back to prior instances of the same sordid behavior by Mueller.
Regarding Your Trump “Investigation” 1.) Why did you hire only lawyers with backgrounds as Democratic Party donors for your investigative team? Were there no Establishment Republicans willing to help railroad President Trump?
(Excerpt) Read more at lifezette.com ...
thanks MAGAthon
Until someone who matters actually does something about Mueller we are just taking turns preaching to the choir. Time for bold, fire mueller and put Rudy there as interim.
We thought Sessions saying, “Conclude” meant to end the investigation. It actually meant, “Go get a subpoena for Trump and get this Presidency over if you can.”
Question # 41. To which agent of a foreign power do you report?
Mueller is a walking anti-Constitutionalist treason and sedition machine. I don't think this country has ever seen the likes of anyone like him in its entire history.
He MUST answer - we DEMAND it!
BOOM!
Blah blah blah.
Mueller’s dirty hands in Uranium One??
Some men/women simply should not have the kind of power that was handed to Mueller, and the others. And after known abuses of power - their careers should be FINISHED — and please STOP with the nonsense of calling them distinguished and honorable!
It’s easy to discern that they are anything but!!!
The selection process obviously needs comprehensive reform. Then if they go on to abuse power the way that Mueller has, there should be a simple process of termination, NOT promotion and fortune!
With all we know about Mueller’s abuse of power, he should be forced to answer these questions publicly.
I can think on only one (in the Grand Tradition of FR I haven’t read the article yet): “Do you have a SCINTILLA of evidence that there was Russian interference in the 2016 election and linking President Trump to same?”
The answer is of course, no and thus no.
Mueller has a lot to answer for. The sooner you can get him before Congress the better!
Please do it now.
Question # 41. To which agent of a foreign power do you report?
#41 A. When did you know about Atta & Co. and why did you not act on it before 9/11?
B. When did you know about Hasan and why did you not act on it before he opened fire on US soldiers and an unborn baby?
C. When did you know about the Tsarnaev family, including the uncle and the in laws? Why did you intentionally ignore the warnings from Russia, England and Saudi Arabia? Why did you not act on this before the bombs went off?
D. Why did you protect OKC's John Doe #2?
E. The SBPD is heard during the chase stating they knew of the San Bernardino shoots two weeks earlier. Why did you not put a stop to them before they went on a Christmas shooting spree?
F. F is for failure. This list of your failures to do your duty can go through every incident of terrorism throughout the years. Please, explain to the US citizens why you have continually ignored and failed to protect us all the years of your career. Since your loyalties are not with the US of A, what country are you loyal?
Thanks bitt.
Louie Ghomert is the bomb!
Why must Gohmert do Jeff Sessions job for him.
1.) Why did you hire only lawyers with backgrounds as Democratic Party donors for your investigative team?
Well, Mueller - answer the damn question or we'll ruin your life... (oops, sorry - forgot citizens aren't allowed to be thugs like our 'intelligence' services and YOU Mueller... so I take back the threat.
Bttp
“Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people. His many actions are a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence. He lacks the judgment and credibility to lead the prosecution of anyone.”
Topics Covered:
—ROBERT MUELLER - BACKGROUND
—MUELLER: THE WHITEY BULGER AFFAIR
—REP. CURT WELDON ATTACKED AND CRUSHED BY ROBERT MUELLER
—ROD ROSENSTEIN
—AN ILLEGAL RAID ON CONGRESS BY MUELLER
—MUELLER’S 5-YEAR UP-OUR-OUT
—NATIONAL SECURITY LETTER ABUSES
—SENATOR TED STEVENS
—THE DISGUSTING TREATMENT OF DR. STEVEN HATFILL
—THE FRAMING OF SCOOTER LIBBY
—MUELLER’S EMBRACE OF THE FRIENDS OF ISLAMIC TERROR
—PURGING THE FBI OF ANTI-TERROR INFORMATION
—PURGING COUNTER-TERRORISM TRAINING MATERIALS
—MUELLER’S UNETHICAL ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
—SPECIAL PROSECUTOR MUELLER’S TROUBLINGLY BIASED HIRES
—GENERAL MICHAEL FLYNN
—FISA ABUSE
—MUELLER IGNORES PROVABLE CRIMES BY THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN, THE FBI, THE FISC, ETC.
By Rep. Louis Gohmert
Interestingly enough, last night Laura Ingraham had the wife and attorney for Blagojevich on. I read a book about that case but I didn’t remember the role of Mueller as FBI director and Fitzpatrick as prosecutor. Nothing like forming incestuous relationships to go after everything you disapprove of...
Worth watching. I figure I’m not doing too bad for a person who gave up watching FOX and all other news back in December. There’s just too much going on now to be out of the loop.
I left FR for a second and found this in my inbox...Fabulous!! It’s about time someone started getting their licks in on this creep.
::::A federal judge on Friday harshly rebuked Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team during a hearing for ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort – suggesting they lied about the scope of the investigation, are seeking “unfettered power” and are more interested in bringing down the president.
“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort,” U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III told Mueller’s team. “You really care about what information Mr. Manafort can give you to lead you to Mr. Trump and an impeachment, or whatever.”
Further, Ellis demanded to see the unredacted “scope memo,” a document outlining the scope of the special counsel’s Russia probe that congressional Republicans have also sought.::::
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.