Perp walk. Perp walk. Perp walk.
Also, perp walk.
Did I mention perp walk?
Didn’t some of ugly spawn marry into Iran?
From the article...
My purpose here, and I do have one, is to note the figure in the carpet of Kerry’s career. I am grateful that Seth Lipsky has written the column “Kerry’s collusion” saving me the trouble. Seth writes:
This has been Mr. Kerry’s modus operandi since, as a young lieutenant just out of the Navy and in the middle of a war, he began freelancing foreign policy. Back then, he snuck off to Paris and met with, among others, representatives of our active wartime enemy, the Viet Cong. Then he came back to America and plumped for their talking points. Later, he testified against American troops before the Senator Foreign Relations committee.
That’s how Mr. Kerry’s career was launched. Now he’s using the same modus operandi to treat with Mr. Zarif to save a deal that even the New York Times concedes was opposed “overwhelmingly” by the United States Congress. And that was tested in the recent election. It pitted, in Hillary Clinton, a one-time state secretary who supported the articles of appeasement with Iran. Mr. Trump opposed the deal and threatened to tear it up.
America thought about this carefully and elected Mr. Trump. He has refused to certify Iranian compliance, and now he is deciding his next step (we’ve long since endorsed withdrawal). The baldness of Mr. Kerry’s breach, though, is in particularly sharp relief, because it takes place amid an effort by the Democrats to overturn the election on the allegation — yet to be leveled in court — that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.
Mr. Kerry is not working entirely in secret. The Boston Globe reports that he has briefed members of Congress, among others, on what he is doing. These, it reports, include the Speaker, Paul Ryan, an opponent of the deal. Mr. Kerry is, though, working with our adversary, Iran, and with various Europeans, who joined President Obama’s envoy at the United Nations in voting for the Iran appeasement, though they knew both houses of Congress were against it.
So what word would one use in respect of Mr. Kerry than “collusion”? And with whom? In Iran, it is an undemocratic state, run by an anti-Semitic camarilla of religious extremists who are preparing an arsenal to deliver weapons of mass destruction against Israel and an America they like to call Satan. So one can put Mr. Kerry down with the rest of the never-Trump faction that seeks to resist — or, in Mr. Kerry’s case — suborn a democratic decision by America’s states.
Will none dare call it treason?
One side is collusion against the Republicans. It is a one sided political game played by the media.
Sessions is all over it, I’m sure...
Typical behavior for a traitor (see his visits to Paris with the N Vietnamese some time ago). It would be entertaining to see him be held accountable for his actions.
Kerry has no power. He needs to arrested. NOW.
Enough of this crap. This is treason. Arrest him and send him to Gitmo.
Kerry is mentally ill and needs to be hospitalized immediately.
Kerry is not familiar with the Logan Act. He thinks it is the controlling statute as to what percentage of a rich widow’s estate you are entitled to should you marry her.
Kerry’s MO
And the nyt warned the trump team over the Logan act. Harrumph
Remember in the olden days when laws used to be enforced?
The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States
Kerry's such a jerk..
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
T&G POLL: With all the breathless allegations of (never-enforced) Logan Act violations for private dealings with foreign powers before President Trump's inauguration, what do YOU make of The Boston Globe report that John Kerry's been conducting private diplomacy with Iran's foreign minister and European leaders on ways to maintain the Iran nuclear deal if Trump dumps it?
Currently, nothing to see, 37%; Lock him up, 62%