If this is supposed to be some kind of “virtue signalling” I am really confused.
Obvious attempt to legitimize Stormy Daniels.
Seeing as how a woman can “revoke consent” the next day, or a wife can run off with her new boyfriend and still get half of the husband’s pension, the business of porn should be front-page news.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3652908/posts
There is no low low enough for progressives.
And who better to find new depths of slime than a progressive journalist?
Well since liberal MSM churnalists are simply “fluffers” for the Democrats, it figures that they would be interested in the “sex worker” industry.
the NY Slimes is the same left wing trash who excoriated woman who would go toe Jets games and flash their boobs at halftime in a certain stairwell- which became a long standing tradition until they ruined it..
The article goes on and on. If they don’t kill you with progressivism, they kill you with boredom.
Its easier to sympathize with Ms. Clifford if folks can be convinced shes not a sperm dumpster...
The past few years have shown a glimmer of whats possible in porn. Now, as Ms. Hearts said, were just waiting for these old white men to die off.
...and there you go.
People who will never make any money in porn.
No red-blooded American male will ever jerk off to photos of a 300 pound, one-legged, 57-year old tranny with face tattoos. Thank God for Russian babes.
CBS 60 Minutes Porn in the USA https://www.cbsnews.com/video/porn-in-the-usa-2/
Pretty good summary. Porn was a bigger sector in the late cable tv business, subsidizing much other non porn content. Fortune 500 Corporations have a red light sector with regular sex worker employees.
Questions can be asked whether or not the 500 are subsidizing the sex work legalization political agitations.
far better than most of the commie/nazi leftist propaganda the NYT publishes