The bottom line is that Avenatti has nothing but his "victim" and her "sketch" and she's not very sympathetic except to watchers of the View. Avenatti himself is just another sleazy lawyer, neither likable nor dislikable but he doesn't have a lot of material to work with. So he repeats his anti-Trump mantra which is that Trump is crazy and reckless and a liar. Same thing the leftist said about Trump before he was elected. Trump just has to show that he is professional and effective and he does that fairly easily every day.
I posted on a thread some info on Avenatti that Rising Serpent over on Twitter was investigating. It looks more and more like this duo was a set up from the get go by someone in the deep State. They seemed to come out of no-where and now they are on every TV program nearly every day?
Who is paying this duo to try and take down this President and his family and ruin their lives?
Good article by Andrew McCarthy, Why All the Secrecy?
There are thus very good reasons why Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein should step in and prevent Special Counsel Mueller from seeking to question the president. But I want to leave you with a different thought. How are we supposed to grapple with whether the president should be compelled to testify when we don’t know what Mueller is alleging? What crime does Mueller want to ask the president about? And if there isn’t one, why are we even talking about an interview, let alone a subpoena?
Yes, all prosecutors want to maintain investigative secrecy. In the vast majority of cases, the enforcement of the law after a serious crime has been committed outweighs other concerns; secrecy enables prosecutors to investigate without smearing innocent people, so we respect the need for it. But secrecy is not an absolute requirement; it must give way when outweighed by other considerations.
It has become ludicrous. The question of whether a prosecutor should be permitted to interview a president hinges on whether the president is a suspect. There is no public evidence that President Trump is. This raises the patent objection that he should not be asked to be interviewed under those circumstances. What we hear in response is, “How do you know he’s not a suspect?” But the reason we don’t know — other than the lack of evidence after two years — is that Mueller won’t deign to tell us, and Rosenstein won’t deign to comply, publicly, with regulations that required him to outline the basis for a criminal investigation.
That is not acceptable. In every other independent-prosecutor investigation in modern history — Watergate, Iran-Contra, Whitewater/Lewinsky — the president and the public have known exactly what was alleged. The prosecutor was able to investigate with all the secrecy the law allows, but under circumstances in which we all understood what was being investigated and why the president was suspected of wrongdoing.
After two years, we are entitled to nothing less. The president should direct Rosenstein to outline, publicly and in detail, the good-faith basis for a criminal investigation arising out of Russia’s interference in the election — if there is one. If he can’t, Mueller’s criminal investigation should be terminated; if he can, Mueller should be compelled to explain (unless Rosenstein’s disclosure makes it clear) why he needs to interview President Trump in order to complete his work.
If Rosenstein and Mueller are reluctant to do that, it can only be because they’ve decided that not only their investigation but also their desire for secrecy take precedence over every other consideration, including the president’s capacity to govern domestically and conduct foreign policy in a dangerous world. But secrecy is not the nation’s top priority. It’s long past time to lay the cards on the table.
Most people do not care about Stormy Daniels. The people who need a reason to hate Trump are grasping at straws to keep hate alive! Most people have great resentment for a media working to destroy Trump.
Rudy on same show as Stormy lawyer, hope they get to go head to head...