Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

Speaking of the “Vote Compact”, how is that not in itself a violation of Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 of the Constitution? It includes compact to increase hold on federal power.


170 posted on 05/08/2018 12:00:32 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: KC_Conspirator
It isn't a violation of Article I Section 10 Clause 3 if they get Congressional approval.

Interestingly, the website for the National Popular Vote Compact video that purports to explain the "myth" of requiring Congressional approval saves the specific point to the last 30 seconds, spending most of the video on a lack of "federal interest" resulting in giving states free rein.

However, they conclude that if Congressional consent is required, it would not be required until the 270th EV state ratifies it, at which time they expect Congress to relent given that a "majority" of voters (actually the legislatures) would presumably be in support of it, and Congress hates to buck the people (except when it comes to Obamacare, border protection, immigration reform, etc.).

-PJ

171 posted on 05/08/2018 12:30:57 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson