Just musing here, but if Nunes gets the House to hold Sessions in contempt of Congress, would that give President Trump sufficient cause to fire him, Rosenstein, and Mueller?
Stormy Daniels perfect mascot for Dem party. Walking around with g string with $$$ bills attached.
Bonjour yall! Laissez le bon Trump rouler!!!
Breton style is best.
Crepe is French for pancake. ;-)
The right stuff.
In with the
"Ceterum censeo Islam esse delendam."
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
When was the last time we saw a pollster like Reuters spike their own poll?
July 2016, when Reuters changed their methodology to put Clinton back on top after their polls showed Trump pulling ahead.
-PJ
Rush is talking about the report from the House Intelligence Committee that was released on Friday.
In particular, Rush has cited the WSJ story posted on Drudge, and the Andrew McCarthy article at NRO.
I’ve read both, and I think Rush is overstating how exculpatory they are to Flynn. (They help Flynn, but not as much as Rush says.)
Rush says that they show Flynn did not lie to the FBI. That’s not what I read in the articles.
What the articles say IMO is that the two FBI agents who interviewed Flynn in January 2017 (one of whom was Strzok), didn’t think Flynn’s demeanor and body language were that of someone telling a lie, i.e., they didn’t think Flynn was lying, based on how they perceived his behavior during the interview.
But that doesn’t cover the *content* of what Flynn said in the interview.
It could well be that Flynn didn’t lie at all, as Rush is saying, but that’s not how I read the two articles which Rush is citing.