WHAT A DISGRACE! Special Counsel Mueller Charged Russian Company Not in Existence at Time of Charge!

Gateway Pundit ^ | May 12, 2018 | Jim Hoft

[Cheerio]

Lawyer: Mueller indicted “the proverbial ham sandwich.” This week, on Wednesday May 9th, a hearing took place between the corrupt Mueller team and one of the Russian Companies they indicted for interfering with the 2016 US election, Concord Management. Concord Management and a sister company Concord Catering were charged by Mueller for defrauding the government. The Mueller crooks and far left hacks were embarrassed again!

A week ago Friday at a hearing on this same case, Mueller’s team asked for the case to be delayed. The judge politely declined and the initial hearing on the case was held on Wednesday. Mueller’s team is represented by former Clinton Foundation attorney, Jeannie Rhee. CNN applauded Rhee for being on the Mueller team while ignoring her and the entire team’s conflicts of interest –

Rhee represented Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit about her private emails, and she also represented the Clinton Foundation in a civil racketeering case that was later dismissed.

Rhee also represented President Barack Obama’s deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes during the House Benghazi Committee’s investigation into the deadly 2012 terrorist attack in Libya.

[bert]

OK, my certainty is not 100% But unlike Crocodile Dundee, I'll not check

[hal ogen]

She IS a dick.

[vette6387]

Another “foreigner” who doesn’t adhere to our Constitution!

[ExTexasRedhead]

Mueller, Stormy Daniels, and her attorney would make a great threesome, ya think?

[euram]

“Mueller, Stormy Daniels, and her attorney would make a great threesome, ya think?”

They could bill it as 2 Fake Boobs and 2 Real Boobs.

[bgill]

Not the least bit surprised. To be sure, CNN will be all over this, right?

[TalBlack]

Wake Up Judge, ...”

Bottom line: They’re all afraid of where an investigation might lead.

[Liz]

A Mueller, Avenatti and Stormy threesome......2 Fake Boobs and 2 Real Boobs.

Dont forge the deviant boob.....Eric Schneiderman's there to watch the action.

[Liz]

If that sandwich doesnt have Russian Dressing on it, Mueller's cooked.

[60Gunner]

Mueller has a dick? Who knew?

Barack Obama.

[Heart of Georgia]

"his name will stink in American history from now on"

Fortunately for Mueller, American history is being purged of white American history.

[Redleg Duke]

Mueller is the second “Ex-Marine” I have seen in my lifetime. I am giving Lee Harvey Oswald the benefit of the doubt.

[Vaduz]

Mueller’s team is represented by former Clinton Foundation attorney, dots there all over the place.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Mueller is the latest to display “If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table”.

Judge to Mueller:

Pound Sand!

[texas booster]

Comments from the lawyers for the defense.

[Arm_Bears]

The ham sandwich fought back in this instance.

[bert]

The judge called it pettifoggery. She knew her english language. Check out the second definition and then a bread sandwich with no ham can be comprehended. She bitch slapped Mueller et al, right there in open court.

pettifogger (plural pettifoggers)

1.Someone who quibbles over trivia, and raises petty, annoying objections and sophistry.
2. An unscrupulous or unethical lawyer, especially one of lesser skill.

[M Kehoe]

Bttt.

5.56mm

[dearolddad]

Jeannie Rhee has no dick.

How can you be sure?

[Cheerio]

I said a year ago - Mueller is making an ass of himself. Now he’s gone beyond that - his name will stink in American history from now on as a partisan, anti-American political hack.

Is the Lame Stream Media reporting this (I never watch)? Therein lies one of America's problems the founders in all their wisdom did not foresee - A CORRUPT AND HIGHLY BIASES MEDIA HELD TO NO ACCOUNT BY ANYONE.

Question of a constitutional attorney - can't the Constitution or laws be amended to stipulate that is the press wants to have the protection of the 1st Amendment they MUST disclose their sources?????