Posted on 05/12/2018 1:30:23 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.
[snip]
The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:
As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."
And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:
Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Why does Gen Flynn need to be pardoned? His case isn’t adjudicated, completely, until he is sentenced.
If it was such a slam dunk, why are they delaying it, again?
Wny didn’t they hand over exculpatory evidence? IE, FBI agents didn’t think he lied, so either McCabe or someone at DOJ changed the paperwork(perjury) or they disregarded it and made up a charge(I don’t even know where to begin with that).
No reason to even think of a Pardon at this point.
While you cannot be arrested for
lying, if in court you say you did something and a cop says you said you had done another one that day , even a tiny it of difference in wording from a statement what not, and you will appear the liar in court.
There is always reasonable doubt, but that goes out the window quickly if you are successfully framed as a liar. Even when you do not lie and it is a typo on a date on a paper written by a lawyer’s secretary, they will team up with the DA to nail you for it.
Flynn didn’t lie. The FBI said so. Comey and McCabe so testified under oath.
But Mueller needed him to have lied, to squeeze him, so he started investigating Flynn’s son, then said the son would be in big trouble unless Flynn pleaded guilty to a crime Mueller knew he didn’t commit.
This means that Mueller is suborning perjury.
If we’re wrong and Flynn actually did lie, then Comey and McCabe did too. Where are their prosecutions?
ConservativeTreeHouse and American Thinker are my two favorite opinion and investigation sites.
This is one of the best articles I’ve seen from American Thinker. Another grand slam.
The job of the worthless Jeff Sessions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.