Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverevergiveup

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB222

Text of the bill regarding this and informed consent is required

As to the issue of non identifiable there is no such thing, this is the premise of all of the DNA services is to match th individual to others. As the sample base grows the precision of matching “blind” samples grown narrower.
Last, what was the purpose of sampling all newborns in the first place, I do not trust them one second that the samples and the source are not connected

I call BS!


9 posted on 05/14/2018 10:15:40 AM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: 100American
“As to the issue of non identifiable there is no such thing”

Actually, there is, although you have a very valid point when it comes to DNA. If the DNA is collected, sequenced, and banked, with no identifying information, the identity of the person from whom the DNA was taken will remain unknown - unless that person offers up another DNA sample later in life. If that sequence (the second one) also gets entered into a searchable database, you could match the two up and identify the source of the original DNA.

The problem is that DNA is so easy to obtain, amplify, and sequence, such that it would be very hard to avoid having your DNA information ‘harvested’ if someone wanted it. I'm not sure what the answer is. Theoretically, it would be possible to develop a person-specific biological weapon if you had their entire DNA sequence.

21 posted on 05/14/2018 11:27:29 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson