Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

What exactly would be Kim’s role in a unified Korea? Kim has to have nukes to stay alive. There is zero upside for him to improve relations.


18 posted on 05/16/2018 8:07:06 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Poison Pill

I don’t think anyone is talking about unification - this is strictly about improving relations.


23 posted on 05/16/2018 8:12:28 AM PDT by GG-1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Poison Pill

Yes, but he would keep his army and gradually have more food for his people. The upside is that he would be more appreciated with his people having full bellies.

And trade would lead to more electricity Etc. I understand that he would have a problem with his labor camps and police state philosophy, but that is not something that we did.

He can stay alive with a treaty with us which we would honor. His troops would have to control the population. And nukes were there to threaten us, his people were never the targets of anything except the secret police.


43 posted on 05/16/2018 8:39:25 AM PDT by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson