That is the essence of Q. The total lack of actual evidence means that the secret/unseen evidence means whatever people want it to mean.
I don’t know how many times I’ve read that ludicrously idiotic Hillary-sex tape hoax-story on Q threads. The two most common responses are, A, what fate Hillary should suffer (which is typically coupled with the comment that she can never be made to suffer as much as the child did), and B, speculation as to when the tape will be released.
There’s no point in arguing that people who didn’t respond believe one thing or another. The point is they *didn’t respond*—all they added to the discussion was silence.
And there is not point in stating that all 800 people on the Q list believe something when there is no proof that they do, I do have personal knowledge that some people on the Q list do not believe that story.
Unless you have the ability to read minds, then those statements are denigrating a lot of people who may or may not believe that particular story.
It would be helpful to qualify your statement instead of accusing everyone there of something you may believe to be true but have no way of knowing.
Silence does not mean agreement, in fact it’s a head’s up in communication that a few probing questions are in order to ascertain the true situation.