Posted on 05/20/2018 9:19:09 PM PDT by Kaslin
How does the left think that normal people are going to react to the lefts rejection of the idea of rational discussion and debate and its attempt to keep them from participating in their own governance? What does the elite think lurks at the bottom of that slippery slope? Do liberals think the normals will A) meekly submit to abuse and be cowed into submission, or B) that the normals will grow even more militant and make their voices heard in other, nastier ways?
Spoiler: The answer is B. Donald Trump is just one manifestation of the blowback against the rule-by-contempt our alleged betters currently practice. And if the election of The Donald doesnt convince them to change their ways, what will come next will not be anywhere near as pleasant.
The ability to discuss and debate issues in good faith is a key principle essential to the maintenance of a democratic republic. Now, this is a real principle, not one of those bogus principles of convenience Fredocon fellow travelers endlessly babble about, like As True Conservatives, we must lose like gentlemen, or Fighting back is icky and scary and not who we are.
The principle of reasoned debate is critical. If the American people cant use reason to determine how to govern our country then that leaves hitting each other over the head, which kind of defeats the whole purpose of having a democratic republic.
Now, the problem for liberals is that when we reason, they lose. Leftism has a historical track record unblemished by success, and that includes its effeminate little brother American liberalism, whose greatest hits include rampant crime, welfare cheats, and national decline. This legacy of failure is why the goateed durwoods lurking around campus coffee shops in berets and ironic Army surplus jackets always insist to anyone within earshot that True socialism has never been tried. Hope springs eternal in the hearts of Marxists, but the rest of us have too much common sense to buy that nonsense.
So, being unable to convince the normals that they have nothing to lose but their chains, our liberal pals have simply given up on the idea of convincing anyone of anything at all. Instead, they are opting for the hitting-over-the-head solution, except their clubs are not wooden. Their clubs are institutional and cultural.
They seek to eliminate our ability to speak thats the de-platforming part of their scheme. They want to eliminate any venues for dissenting argument. Europe is their model there, you can actually be arrested and imprisoned for saying words. Think about that they do, and it gets them all excited and sweaty. They would love to do it here do you have any doubt that the Democrats, back in power, would ban hate speech, and do you have any doubt that hate speech would be defined as pretty much anything we are interested in saying?
Now, the problem for liberals is that when we reason, they lose. Leftism has a historical track record unblemished by success, and that includes its effeminate little brother American liberalism, whose greatest hits include rampant crime, welfare cheats, and national decline. This legacy of failure is why the goateed durwoods lurking around campus coffee shops in berets and ironic Army surplus jackets always insist to anyone within earshot that True socialism has never been tried. Hope springs eternal in the hearts of Marxists, but the rest of us have too much common sense to buy that nonsense.
So, being unable to convince the normals that they have nothing to lose but their chains, our liberal pals have simply given up on the idea of convincing anyone of anything at all. Instead, they are opting for the hitting-over-the-head solution, except their clubs are not wooden. Their clubs are institutional and cultural.
They seek to eliminate our ability to speak thats the de-platforming part of their scheme. They want to eliminate any venues for dissenting argument. Europe is their model there, you can actually be arrested and imprisoned for saying words. Think about that they do, and it gets them all excited and sweaty. They would love to do it here do you have any doubt that the Democrats, back in power, would ban hate speech, and do you have any doubt that hate speech would be defined as pretty much anything we are interested in saying?
Reasoned discussion requires good faith argument an argument that accurately characterizes the opposing view and refutes it with facts and evidence. But since liberalism cant refute conservative arguments with facts and evidence history and human nature are insurmountable obstacles they need to attack arguments normal people are not making. Its a bad faith strawman strategy, and it often manifests itself in the New Obtuseness, the stubborn insistence that what someone just said is something entirely different than what he actually said. Its basically fancy lying.
The New Obtuseness was in full effect recently when Trump called MS-13 dirtbags animals. Despite the video of him discussing these evil gangbanging scum, the liberals and their media windowlickers insisted that he was calling all illegal aliens animals. And they knew it wasnt true they just lied, knowingly and intentionally. They do it all the time. We, presumably, are supposed to disbelieve our own lying eyes and ears.
And this ploy is getting more common. For example, the NRA rejection of the idea of an unaccountable government bureaucracy being able to ban citizens from exercising a key natural right merely by putting their names on a list that has demonstrably been proven to be full of errors becomes The NRA wants to let terrorists buy guns. Of course, that fits in with how all of us NRA members are terrorists because we refuse to give up our rights because of some crime we didnt commit. The New Obtuseness is a fresh take on old-fashioned dishonesty.
Then theres the idiotic idea that Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick thinks exits cause school shootings, because conservatives deny exits or something. Apparently Do something only means disarming innocent citizens and does not include doing anything that might actually address the problem, like hardening the target by limiting access as occurs in every other single secure area in our society. The New Obtuseness counts on you being stupid.
I experienced it when liberals and their Never Trump poodles collectively wet themselves screeching that I was advocating a second civil war in a column expressly and repeatedly stating the precise opposite. And I have $100 that says some commenter or social media idiot repeats that lie about this column too.
Now, this tactic really doesnt work no one who can count to 21 without taking off his shoes and pants buys this baloney but it does make the normals really, really mad. While using the New Obtuseness feels good right now take that, Trump! its not a good long-term strategy and a two-edged sword. Any strategy that makes you effectively defend MS-13 is a poor one. I cant wait for the campaign ads this fall.
This kind of rhetoric doesnt inspire normals to give up and allow the left to win the fight over policy by default. Instead, it encourages normal people to tell their opponents to molon labe. Double down on democracy, liberals, because you wont like whats at the bottom of the slippery slope.
The foot soldiers don't think that far ahead, and the puppetmasters deem they're untouchable. Where do you think that ends?
bookmark
“Liberal pals have simply given up on the idea of convincing anyone of anything.” True. Liberals are anti-Christian, anti-American and spoiled kids with adult American salaries. Their punishment is to remain shallow anti-Christian, anti-American liberals.
Great read.
Thanks for posting
Might be OT but here goes: If you don’t have time, zero in on 31:31.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQVlKc_V3C0
It surprises me that u tube has let this go on for as long as it has. Any clues?
The New Obtuseness is a great term for this. To see it on full display, watch the Jordan Peterson interview on Channel 4 News in the UK. The interviewers questioning was full of intellectual dishonesty and straw men, with a distinct lack of rational debate. Peterson hammers her with facts, logic, and reality.
Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism
https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54
The lie is the WEAPON used most often by the anti-truth, anti-freedom, anti-individual criminal, conman, Clinton, deceiver, dirtbag, d'rat, marxist, moron, progressive, punk, socialist, scumbag, tyrant, totalitarian, etc., etc.
Very good article. Thanks for posting.
” no one who can count to 21 without taking off his shoes and pants buys this baloney”
Sexism! He is saying that women biologically can only count to 20! :/
Remember who is the Great Deceiver.
Hes part the their core, though they know it not, since they believe not.
I was going for Satan.
I am not certain there is a difference between the two.
“Sexism! He is saying that women biologically can only count to 20!”
Women can count to 22.
Well, Tench, tell us. How does it end? Don't leave us, er..., hanging!
23 for that gal in Total Recall.
Mr. Rhett, you IS bad!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.