Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Somebody correct me (and explain it to me) if I'm wrong, but shouldn't one of those sentences above read like this:

"Without a settlement, it would be legally difficult, if not impossible, for Obamacare to be eliminated because the Trump administration has a duty to enforce existing federal law."

??

4 posted on 05/21/2018 6:09:11 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alancarp

I noticed that, too. I believe you are correct.


7 posted on 05/21/2018 6:23:16 AM PDT by Qiviut (Obama's Legacy in two words: DONALD TRUMPIt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

Yes. I read it over and over trying to get it make sense. The author needs to make a correction.


8 posted on 05/21/2018 6:37:14 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia (truth will trump their lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

I agree, I kept rereading that sentence and it never made sense


11 posted on 05/21/2018 7:05:18 AM PDT by CottonBall (Thank you , Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson