Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: centurion316

The dems would be nuts to run anyone but a minority in 2020, preferably male. I don’t think minority males turn out for a minority female like they would a male. The difference in the minority turnout between Clinton and Obama would have won the 2016 election for the dems.

Freegards


10 posted on 05/24/2018 7:22:45 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ransomed
The dems would be nuts to run anyone but a minority in 2020, preferably male. I don’t think minority males turn out for a minority female like they would a male.

I think there is a lot of pent-up resentment from black men towards black women. Black women get double-preferences under affirmative action, both for college and employment, then display disdainful attitudes towards black men over their relative lack of success.

In 2016 exit polls, 13% of black men voted for Trump, but only 4% of black women.

46 posted on 05/24/2018 7:57:16 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Ransomed
The dems would be nuts to run anyone but a minority in 2020, preferably male. I don’t think minority males turn out for a minority female like they would a male.

I would add that the Dems are ripe for a fracture along sex/race lines. If there's a black woman running, and she gets pushed aside by the party bosses in favor of a black male, look for some fireworks.

60 posted on 05/24/2018 8:13:39 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson