1 posted on
05/26/2018 1:33:10 PM PDT by
Theoria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Theoria
No.
Chicago doesn’t have a crime problem. They have strict gun control.
2 posted on
05/26/2018 1:35:16 PM PDT by
jazminerose
(Adorable Deplorableu)
To: Theoria
3 posted on
05/26/2018 1:35:26 PM PDT by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Theoria
4 posted on
05/26/2018 1:36:47 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
To: Theoria
The cams would be declared racist. All perps would be youths or teens.
6 posted on
05/26/2018 1:41:17 PM PDT by
HBAR223
To: Theoria
It won’t hurt. Putting 1/3 in Austin, 1/3 in Grand Crossing and 1/3 in Woodlawn would be the most productive use of them.
most of the crime occurs in a few neighborhoods.
There is no privacy on public streets.
Can you imagine the graft possibilities from a contract to supply 30,000 cameras? Aldermen are salivating at the prospect.
8 posted on
05/26/2018 1:43:28 PM PDT by
arrogantsob
(See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
To: Theoria
Sure, if they’re launched at the head of the troublmakers.
9 posted on
05/26/2018 1:44:36 PM PDT by
bigbob
(Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
To: Theoria
Depends on who they hire to watch the video coming from the cameras.
10 posted on
05/26/2018 1:44:41 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: Theoria
London has a camera every few feet and they have no crime. Oh wait....
To: Theoria
13 posted on
05/26/2018 1:49:16 PM PDT by
PGalt
14 posted on
05/26/2018 1:53:12 PM PDT by
tomkat
To: Theoria
have they ever read the 4th Amendment? just asking . . .
and please no legalistic BS about being in public and not having an expectation of privacy (which is between human individuals on the street, the gov’t is a different beast altogether.)
15 posted on
05/26/2018 1:56:31 PM PDT by
txnativegop
(The political left, Mankinds intellectual hemlock)
To: Theoria
30,000 more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens would be more effective.
16 posted on
05/26/2018 2:12:34 PM PDT by
Disambiguator
(Keepin' it analog.)
To: Theoria
No. They’ll simply shoot em out or steal them for sale back to the city.
17 posted on
05/26/2018 2:22:05 PM PDT by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: Theoria
Remember the opening of
The Wire"?
D’Angelo: You’re never gonna hit it, man.
18 posted on
05/26/2018 2:26:19 PM PDT by
Sooth2222
(Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.")
To: Theoria
No, but the best footage would make great gibsmedat TV
19 posted on
05/26/2018 2:27:14 PM PDT by
C210N
(Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
To: Theoria
The ferals will either steal or shoot the cameras. Idiots.
22 posted on
05/26/2018 2:31:59 PM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: Theoria
Armed with advanced gadgets and mapping, officers can get to crime scenes “in time to see the guy still shooting.” Bullshit.
23 posted on
05/26/2018 2:32:54 PM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: Theoria
They’ll put up cameras... and then go nuts citing and arresting decent people who may walk or miss the stupid, revenue earning laws and regulations
To: Theoria
No.
The cameras won't show us anything we don't know already.
The only thing that would work to solve Chicagos' (or any other urban district) crime problem is to truthfully and honestly discuss many issues deemed off limits.
No problem can ever be solved until you get to the truth of the matter.
To: Theoria
30,000 cameras?
Gangsta target practice.
33 posted on
05/26/2018 3:09:37 PM PDT by
moovova
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
