Posted on 06/02/2018 7:54:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Wrong!!! Pelosi cares deeply about the unemployed as well as the poor and destitute.
Without them, she has NOTHING to harp,weep, criticize and politicize about.
The higher employment rises, the higher wages rise, the higher confidence in the future rises, the less Pelosi and her kind have to whine about.
Misery is the chief talking point of the left. It is their lifeblood. Hhappy, contented people are the left’s enemy.
The comments on the NYT article are a hoot, if you have a sense of humor (which should be easy to have, as they are mostly sour “yeah but” comments). The left is simultaneously giving credit to Hussein, while pooh-poohing the job numbers as “McJobs”.
To a perpetual political parasite they may mean little, but to the labor force it indicates the at do to supply and demand wages should be going up soon. But Democrats like poverty, that’s why they want open borders and illegal aliens. So they support the foreign invasion of the USA.
I long for two days:
1. The day Pelosi Galore is unemployed.
2. The day Pelosi Galore is no more.
———————————————————————
I long opposite. She should be there for as long as possible for the world to see what true democrats is.
Great post!
Second rule of holes: When your enemy is digging them selves into a hole, hand her a shovel.
Resistor sister, Pelosi, and the ‘rats are out-of-touch with millions of citizens in this republic...
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-weekly-address-27/
Pelosi is right. Strong unemployment mean little when liberal regulations drive up the cost of living well beyond the means of the average worker.
This is the equivalent of her ‘crumbs’ comment regarding the tax breaks.
Workers were pretty much stuck with their current employer, income was stagnant or declining, opportunities were limited. People were terrified of losing their jobs, because that meant long periods of unemployment. Employers could boot them around, reducing benefits and perks, cutting vacation time, and treating them only a little better than indentured servants. This is one of the reasons why there was a lot of corporate support for a Hillary victory.
For a party that claims to be anti corporatist, and pro worker, the democrat party was the best for corporations, and really bad for the regular employee. The democrat party was really bad for blue collar workers. The democrat party policies and agenda made no effort to improve the economy for the average worker. Their agenda is all about advancing socialism, creating a toxic and divisive environment among different people, and at the same time increasing the number of poor and dependent people.
The Democrats always accuse our side of being extremists, but nothing is more extreme than them trying to make us poor so they can control our lives.
Your post illustrated that very well.
I hope that President Trump turns the mid terms into a referendum of Nancy Pelosi and her policies.
Funny you mention that; Pelosi specifically said ObamaCare would give people more freedom to leave jobs (I believe she used artists as an example), and it had exactly the opposite effect - because it would force people into the ruinous ObamaCare fiasco. You’re right - workers lost a lot of ground under Otoken (he never represented taxpayers, just 1%ers and the welfare class, along with “otherized” nothings) - and that came back and killed Hillary in the Upper Midwest.
doddering Old corrupt leftist politician
rats try to create a world that only rats can flourish in
This woman is dead from the neck up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.