You can’t make this up. USA story headline:
“Supreme Court rules narrowly for baker who refused to create same-sex couple’s wedding cake”
NARROWLY? 7-2 is NARROWLY?????
Dang, fake news is getting pretty brazen in their lies.
What the mean by "narrow" is that they are claiming the case was decided on narrow legal grounds that wouldn't apply in other similar cases. My summary indicates that it may not be so narrow as many are saying - it was decided on free exercise grounds, an area the court has studiously avoided up to now. It seems the court said that fee exercise is more than freedom of belief or worship.
Dang, fake news is getting pretty brazen in their lies.
Have you read the decision? Have you read the comments on this thread? Before SHOUTING, you might want to take a little time to understand what a narrow decision by the Supreme Court means. It has nothing to do with the number of Justices that agree with the decision. The statement is quite true, the decision was 7-2 and the opinion was decidedly narrow.
In fact, yes, the finding is on narrow grounds....