[Lurker]

More winning!

L

[stylin19a]

Not yet.

"It is proper to hold that whatever the outcome of some future controversy involving facts similar to these, the Commission's actions here violated the Free Exercise Clause, and its order must be set aside.'That requirement," the court concludes, "was not met here. When the Colorado Civil Rights Commission considered this case, it did not do so with the religious neutrality that the Constitution requires.

I'm guessing it gets kicked back to the Commission. I'm guessing they won't want to give back 135k and wont want to make the bakers whole.

[bert]

It is I believe a net loss. The baker was severely damaged. Who will pay the damages and restore the baker’s good name?

Does the baker now try to get justice in a local civil court? It will not happen.

The baker’s finincial loss is to the queers vindictive winning