Narrow, as in addressing very specific details of the case, not a broad win for free speech or religious liberty.
—
That may be true, but it’s also true that a majority of the people reading the headline are going to be misled into thinking the vote was narrow.
Which is why they wrote it that way, of course.
Don’t be so sure its all that narrow. I don’t know that the the court has every before held that “free exercise” extends to the religious beliefs of persons in their daily and commercial activities. The had long argued it doesn’t and this indicates that it does. That would be huge. Free exercise means more than freedom of worship.