Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raiderboy

Interesting. So the same Supreme court which imposed homosexual marriage, is also of the opinion that those in the wedding business don’t have to service homosexual weddings.


18 posted on 06/04/2018 7:33:43 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

It’s ironic that we didn’t need Kennedy’s swing vote in this case. Maybe he’s just a grandstander who wanted to be seen with the majority?


49 posted on 06/04/2018 7:40:49 AM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Not the SAME Supreme Court.


81 posted on 06/04/2018 7:49:52 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Nobody in any business has to. This is not about “cakes” , If I make furniture and two homosexuals come in and I believe God’s Word ( Leviticus) that they are an abomination to God, I can deny service!!


103 posted on 06/04/2018 7:56:30 AM PDT by raiderboy (" weÂ’ll close down the country because we need border" DJT NOW !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“business don’t have to service”

The decision partially hinged on the fact that the bakery would’ve sold them another cake in the shop. They just wouldn’t make a “special” one.


114 posted on 06/04/2018 8:02:03 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson