The fundamental question of whether or not a business can deny services or goods to a person by citing religious belief was not settled. If this case were to be taken back to the Colorado Civil Rights Commission and the same decision reached without the issue of alleged antireligious bias entering into it, that ruling could well be upheld by the same SCOTUS. A similar case could result in a decision upholding the rights of the customer. They kicked the can down the road.
I disagree vehemently. The issue was NOT that homos could force a Christian to serve them in their decadence except the state has to be nice to the Christian. The issue was do Christians have to serve people living in abomination and the answer 7-2 was NO!! This means that religious freedom triumphs over all other civil rights and there is absolutely no doubt about that. And that was the correct decision.