To: hercuroc
It's legally "narrow": the majority opinion didn't lay out any broader doctrine or test of the 1st Amendment's free exercise clause.
It only said that in this instance, the consideration of the case by the Colorado government was improperly tainted by anti-religious bias.
39 posted on
06/04/2018 7:38:36 AM PDT by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
To: pierrem15
There you go again!
Clouding the issue with facts.
Sheeeeeeesh
182 posted on
06/04/2018 9:03:23 AM PDT by
Roccus
(When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
To: pierrem15
236 posted on
06/04/2018 11:03:34 AM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson