what exactly was it arrested for?
Posted on 06/04/2018 11:26:57 AM PDT by deplorableindc
Sessions is playing 3D chess; just wait!
We need strong leadership at DOJ.
“but prosecutors offered no evidence that he personally destroyed property.”
>Why not?
They’re probably young lawyers. Maybe they’re throwing the game; sort of like “prosecutor nullification.”
what exactly was it arrested for?
“you won’t catch me in a group doing that sort of thing.”
What if your group is attacked by leftard scoundrels?
Then you defend yourself, but then that isn’t what I was talking about. Those folks go out there seeking to cause mayhem.
We don’t.
“We don’t.”
Clearly. Way back when the sodomite “pride” parades started, I halfway expected someone—possibly a large group of someones—to open fire on one from the rooftops.
AFAIK, it has never happened.
Why? We don’t.
Agreed.
Take a deep breath before reading the below article, which leaves only the question, why did they do that?:
D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Robert Morin found that prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, which is part of the Justice Department, had committed Brady violations by withholding undercover videos that James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas had turned over to the government.
It really sounds like you have some overzealous prosecutors that not only overcharged people but then withheld evidence.
Overcharging is hard to blame on underlings where withholding evidence might be.
Falling on their own sword for a reverse psychology psyops to make the right look bad seems unlikely too.
It kinds of sounds like overzealous incompetence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.