First of all, I’m not a misandrist. Far from it. I strongly support men’s rights. But I don’t support a man’s “right” to abuse women through “polygamy”. And that is exactly what polygamy is: abuse.
There are two main advantages of polygamy for men: More than one woman to have sex with and the fact that the man is economically supported by the “wives”. He can sit on his ass all day while his wives go to work and do all the housework and yardwork. The so-called “husband” is responsible for absolutely nothing.
I dare you to cite any advantages of polygamy for women. The women are responsible for financially supporting the husband, taking care of the home and kids and sexually satisfying the “husband”. Sign me up! (Sarcasm)
So called “Christian” polygamy is even worse than muslim polygamy. At least, in islamic polygamy, each wife gets their own home and never has to see the other women.
OTOH, in “Christian” polygamy, the husband selfishly and cruelly expects the wives to live in the same home.
Do you actually believe that the women wouldn’t HATE each others guts? Do you believe that the wives wouldn’t get insanely, violently jealous as they watch their husband go to bed with another woman?
Newsflash: Women get very jealous and only a desperate woman with no self esteem would tolerate her husband sleeping with another woman, especially under her own roof. That is cruelty beyond measure.
Since you’re such a proponent for polygamy, what are your views on polyandry? If men can have harems, so can women. Correct? What’s the difference?
Your chauvinism and misogyny is showing. Only a devoted misogynist would advocate for polygamy.
Then why start your missive with a redefinition of "abuse" pulled straight out of your poop chute? Your denial of misandry is preposterous given the rest of your post. The assertion is as laughable as "I'm not a perfectionist, I just want it done right!"
There are two main advantages of polygamy for men: More than one woman to have sex with and the fact that the man is economically supported by the “wives”. He can sit on his ass all day while his wives go to work and do all the housework and yardwork. The so-called “husband” is responsible for absolutely nothing.
Talk about delusional! Even lazy men have kept their wives and children fed, housed, and clothed all through human history. Doubtless, you've never read anything about the role of women in the family that wasn't written before 1960, and also written by a woman.
I dare you to cite any advantages of polygamy for women. The women are responsible for financially supporting the husband, taking care of the home and kids and sexually satisfying the “husband”. Sign me up! (Sarcasm)
I dare YOU to cite any society where women were "responsible for financially supporting the husband, taking care of the home and kids and sexually satisfying the “husband.”' You've got a fantasy narrative stuck in your head that is a statistical zero.
As for the advantage of polygamy for women...how about avoiding everything for which they bitch about being a single mother!
So called “Christian” polygamy is even worse than muslim polygamy. At least, in islamic polygamy, each wife gets their own home and never has to see the other women.
Source, please.
OTOH, in “Christian” polygamy, the husband selfishly and cruelly expects the wives to live in the same home.
Source, please.
Do you actually believe that the women wouldn’t HATE each others guts? Do you believe that the wives wouldn’t get insanely, violently jealous as they watch their husband go to bed with another woman?
When the alternative is single motherhood? Only if she's so radically histrionic and self-absorbed she can studiously ignore the example of thousands of years of human history.
I got news for you lady, there's a reason muslim conquerers have always killed the men, but taken the women as wives...because they could.(i.e. women will learn to live with it.)
Newsflash: Women get very jealous and only a desperate woman with no self esteem would tolerate her husband sleeping with another woman, especially under her own roof. That is cruelty beyond measure.
More like melodrama beyond measure, but it's pretty obvious that's where you live. You keep forgetting historical precedent.
Since you’re such a proponent for polygamy, what are your views on polyandry? If men can have harems, so can women. Correct? What’s the difference?
"Proponent?" What, because I wondered about it as an alternative to raising kids alone?
As for polyandry, that would kind of defeat the purpose, wouldn't it? If our single mom could get a husband all to herself, she wouldn't have any reason to consider polygamy, would she?
Your chauvinism and misogyny is showing. Only a devoted misogynist would advocate for polygamy.
Like many American women, you don't seem to understand you don't get to define reality. Only a committed, marxist, atheist could deny the validity of thousands of years of human history...See, I can be a histrionic ass, too!
In closing, how about telling us what "men's rights" you support?