Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dinesh D'Souza and Rosie O'Donnell FEC violations different
Politifact ^ | 06/07/2018 | Manuela Tobias

Posted on 06/07/2018 4:05:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Backlash to President Donald Trump’s pardon of Dinesh D’Souza caused complaints of a double standard among conservatives.

In an interview with the Austin American-Statesman, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, told the reporter that D’Souza faced political persecution for a crime liberal comedian Rosie O’Donnell had committed five-fold. (Cruz also claimed credit for the pardon and called D’Souza his friend.)

"What’s interesting is, just a few weeks ago we saw revelations that Rosie O’Donnell apparently committed the same offense five times, five times, when she broke the identical law that Dinesh was prosecuted for," Cruz said. "I don’t recall any of those liberal activists on Twitter calling for Rose O’Donnell to be prosecuted."

Did O’Donnell commit the same offense as D’Souza? The two cases are very different.

The Federal Election Commission caps donations to individual candidates at $2,700 per election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are counted separately.

On May 20, 2014, D’Souza was convicted of a felony for making illegal contributions to Wendy Long’s unsuccessful challenge of Kirsten Gillibrand to represent New York in the U.S. Senate. Long was a friend from D’Souza’s time at Dartmouth College.

D’Souza was allowed to contribute a maximum of $5,000 to a single candidate. (The limit on each election was $2,500 in 2012 due to inflation, and this covered the primary and general election.) In March 2012, D’Souza gave $10,000 on behalf of himself and his wife. He then directed his assistant to also contribute $5,000 each on behalf of themselves and their spouses for a total of $20,000. D’Souza reimbursed them.

(Excerpt) Read more at politifact.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignfinance; clickbait; dsouza; fec; ihatedsouza; opistrolling; rosieodonnell

1 posted on 06/07/2018 4:05:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The New York Post reported that O’Donnell made the following contributions, exceeding the individual limit of $2,700 by a total of $5,400.

$4,700 to Alabama Sen. Doug Jones in the special general election against Roy Moore.

$3,600 to Pennsylvania Rep. Conor Lamb for the special election he won in March.

$2,950 to California Rep. Adam Schiff for his primary congressional race.

$4,200 to Lauren Underwood, an Illinois congressional candidate, for her primary. (Note: when we searched the FEC individual contributor database, we found $2,700 are marked as going towards the primary campaign and $1,500 towards the general.)

$3,450 to Omar Vaid, a congressional candidate in Staten Island and Brooklyn, for his primary.

O’Donnell told the New York Post she did not deliberately exceed the limit.

“If $2,700 is the cut off — (candidates) should refund the money,” she said. “I don’t look to see who I can donate most to … I just donate assuming they do not accept what is over the limit.”

O’Donnell indeed broke FEC rules, but campaign finance experts told us this type of violation goes unpunished as long as there is no intent to deceive. The money can be refunded or redirected to the candidate’s next race.


2 posted on 06/07/2018 4:06:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Fakenews. She used different names and addresses.


3 posted on 06/07/2018 4:09:36 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"as long as there is no intent to deceive conservative troublemaker involved. If so, evil intent must be assumed.
4 posted on 06/07/2018 4:12:45 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Politfake finds no violation of a law because of the novel theory, advanced by James "Jimmy The Weasel" Comey, that if a liberal claims she doesn't believe she was violating the law, then she wasn't.

Yawn.

That the sun is going to come up tomorrow is actually a less reliable prediction than Poltifake's predictable response.

5 posted on 06/07/2018 4:15:34 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward 5th Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Source? That’s a huge omission if true.


6 posted on 06/07/2018 4:24:48 PM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

According to Politicrap, it all boils down to how much money was contributed..........In Rosie’s case, while in violation, she gets a pass. But then again, she didn’t have the Obama machine looking to bust her.......


7 posted on 06/07/2018 4:25:10 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Mother nature is a serial killer......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

May 5, 2018 · REVEALED: Trump nemesis Rosie O’Donnell illegally exceeded campaign contribution limits to FIVE different Dem candidates using different addresses and variations of her name. ..


8 posted on 06/07/2018 4:29:15 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“as long as there is no intent to deceive.”

I’m sure the multiple addresses she used was just an unintentional oversight.


9 posted on 06/07/2018 4:30:31 PM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Per article: ‘The rather small amounts in excess of the limits, as well as the fact that O’Donnell made no effort to conceal the contributions’

Outright LIE. Rosie the Pig, used different names and addresses.


10 posted on 06/07/2018 4:31:36 PM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
Thank you. The source is the NY Post.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/05/06/rosie-odonnell-used-5-addresses-4-names-sized-dem-donations/

11 posted on 06/07/2018 4:36:11 PM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Politifart blowing smoke again.


12 posted on 06/07/2018 4:43:10 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heights

Author used Comeystain’s “no intent” apparently...

#Libsplaining


13 posted on 06/07/2018 4:44:06 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
Fakenews. She used different names and addresses.

That alone proves her "mistakes" were intended to deceive. Politifact is a left-wing propaganda outfit. They can go suck a lemon.

14 posted on 06/07/2018 4:55:47 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

“The variations in her name were as follows: Rose Odonnell, Rose O’Donnell, Rosie O’Donnell, and Rosie Odonnell. She listed two different zip codes (which correspond with homes she owns) in two of the donations that exceeded the limit.”


15 posted on 06/07/2018 5:16:10 PM PDT by Pelham (California, Mexico's socialist colony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson