Posted on 06/07/2018 10:17:43 PM PDT by iowamark
An Iowa court has determined that the states ban on Medicaid coverage for medically necessary surgical care for transgender residents is unconstitutional.
Chief District Judge Arthur E. Gamble of the Des Moines-based Fifth Judicial District of Iowa found that the Iowa Department of Human Services ban on surgical coverage violates both the Iowa Civil Rights Act and the states constitution. In his opinion, Gamble ordered DHS to immediately approve the womens request for pre-approval of coverage under Medicaid.
Both women, Carol Ann Beal, 42, of northwest Iowa, and EerieAnna Good, 27, of the Quad Cities, have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria and legally changed their names, and had their birth certificates, drivers licenses, and Social Security cards changed to reflect their correct names and gender identity. Both women also began hormone therapy, and were advised by their doctors to pursue surgery for treatment of their gender dysphoria.
Iowas DHS office rejected both womens requests for coverage, citing the ban. Afterwards, the women enlisted the help of the American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Iowa, and sued, arguing that the ban was unconstitutional.
Lawyers from the ACLU and ACLU of Iowa pointed out that Medicaid otherwise provides coverage for medically necessary surgeries utilized by transgender people, that would normally be covered had the individual in question been cisgender. Gamble echoed this in his opinion. DHS does not explain why the medical necessity of requests for sex reassignment surgeries could not simply be evaluated under the same criteria as other requested surgeries or treatment of non-transgender individuals, he writes. Petitioners have provided clear medical documentation outlining the medical necessity of their requested procedures. Thus, the Court sees no reason why DHS and the MCOs need an additional and indefinite period of time to develop new and separate criteria for evaluating requests by transgender individuals as opposed to simply applying the existing criteria.
Todays decision is historic for civil rights in Iowa, because it recognizes for the first time in a court decision what weve long known, that transgender Iowans are protected by the Iowa Constitutions guarantee of equal protection, as well as by the Iowa Civil Rights Act, Rita Bettis, the legal director of the ACLU of Iowa, said in a statement.
We are so relieved for our brave clients that they can finally get the gender confirming surgical care that all their doctors agree is medically necessary for them, Bettis added. We are honored to represent them in their long journey for themselves and for all other transgender Iowans to be treated equally and fairly under the law.
In 2014, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services invalidated its ban on Medicare coverage for surgery and other transition-related care. Since then, several states have begun eliminating their state Medicaid bans on transition-related surgery, and individuals in other states, including Minnesota and Wisconsin, have sued their state health departments to eliminate the Medicaid exclusion.
The court has brought Iowa in line with the current understanding of the critical needs for transgender people, John A. Knight, a senior staff attorney with the national ACLU, said in a statement. By recognizing and rejecting the historic discrimination faced by transgender people, the court is opening the door to the life-saving medical care and necessary gender-affirming treatment that transgender people are too often denied. The court found that when the Medicaid ban was first implemented more than two decades ago, much less was known about gender dysphoria, and gender identity was not protected under the Iowa Civil Rights Act. Gender identity (as well as sexual orientation) has since been added as a protected class, and the Iowa Constitution guarantees equal protection for all Iowa residents, regardless of characteristics that are covered in the Civil Rights Act. Therefore, the court had no choice but to find the ban unconstitutional.
We are thrilled that our states unconstitutional ban on transition-related surgical care has been struck down, Daniel Hoffman Zinnel, the executive director of LGBTQ rights organization One Iowa, said in a statement. Through our work with transgender Iowans, we have seen firsthand how powerful, life-changing, and absolutely essential gender-affirming surgery can be for transgender people grappling with gender dysphoria. This decision will, quite literally, save lives.
This has been a long time coming, Beal said in a statement. Im so glad I can get the care I need, and Im glad that other Iowans can now get the same care. Transition-related care is a medical issue, plain and simple. Its like any other surgery that a doctor would recommend for you or a family member. Public or private insurance would pay for it, and youd just do it and move ahead with your life.
I look forward to the day when someone fighting to get the transition-related medical care they need isnt in the news because they had to go to court to fight for it. But Im doing it because someone needs to be the trailblazer here, she added. I want to make it easier for the younger people who need this surgery, so they dont have to go through the struggles I have had to go through.
Either both are elective surgeries or all plastic surgery or for that matter any injectables or anything that supports someone being more like they imagine or want to be or feel like should be covered.
All viagra should also be covered now too as all men should be able to have sex whenever they feel like it too. And breast augmentation. lol.
Maybe I have a different Constitution. Someone find choppadicoffome in there.
Will never happen. There are no 7 story buildings in Iowa.
that’s hairy.
A new twist for farmersonly.com.
Really? The above is part of the Des Moines skyline.
Or the closest guy with a weed whacker.
This kind of irks me because all throughout my late 20’s and 30’s I had Rosacea/dermatitis with pretty bad flares. My derm thought light therapy would be beneficial and sent in a recommendation to my insurance company. Of course they denied it. Calling it cosmetic or whatever. That’s BS. I mean yeah, it makes you look crappy but the underlying issue is vascular/inflammatory and causes burning sensations, extreme sensitivity, I couldn’t use any of the topicals out at the time and was allergic to the antibiotics used for it. So, I hid socially a lot of the time. Whatever. What’s done is done. I still have rosacea with small amounts of psoriasis but it’s under control for the most part. There was a specialty prescription vitamin available once I hit my 40’s that cost 200 a month, insurance wouldn’t cover it either but it worked for me. Could only afford to take that once in awhile not on the regular.
Good one :)
Waiting for the Furries to sue....
And this is why cultures who appreciate the fragility of social order throw their anomalies and aberrations into a volcano.
Those who want to keep their souls generally use mental asylums.
how about we DO allow our tax money to be wasted this way,
but only on this judge?
Chief Judge Gamble, Clive, was appointed to the bench in 1983.
More lawfare.
Is the judge elected?
Is the Iowa court medically challenged, biased, or both?
People with gender confusion have a mental issue that is treatable without surgery. Gender reassignment surgery should be illegal because it mutilates the patient.
Surgery to treat a serious mental disorder is insane.
What happened to Iowa?
Oh now its a mental illness. Isnt that convenient.
Shouldnt that disqualify them for, oh say, the Military?
Psychiatrists who have remained silent are responsible for legitimizing this diagnosis. JMHO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.