[robroys woman]

I understand that it could be very effective, but so could house to house searches without warrants. The latter is unconstitutional. The former is fascism.

The ends don’t justify the means.

[frog in a pot]

"The former is fascism."

That is an interesting view; please elaborate.

[mewzilla]

We already have a national ID card. It’s called a passport. Fedzilla could issue them at no out-of-pocket costs to citizens. Then employers can ask to see your passport. Works for me.

[ridesthemiles]

House to house searches are nothing compared to Jerry Brown planning on having ‘monitors’ verifying how many toilet flushes you do per day.

[jiggyboy]

What would be the “means” and “ends” in this case, and what’s this about unconstitutionality and fascism.

[RWGinger]

Please explain how verifying a potential employee is LEGAL to work here is fascism
I don’t think it means what you think it means

[catnipman]

“The former [e-verify] is fascism.

is it “fascism” to require driver licenses?

is it “fascism” to require vehicle licenses?

is it “fascism” to require photo ID to get on an airplane?

is it “fascism” to require photo ID to vote?

is it “fascism” to require employers to require that workers provide social security numbers in order that Fed income tax be withheld and paid to the FedGov?

is it “fascism” to require verification of citizenship to register to vote?

if not, then why is requiring employers to use e-verify “fascism”?

if so, then what is your definition of “fascism”?