How would he feel if he was on the national stage and his wife tried to undermine his career? This isn't his first time. In fact, the only reason he's getting any attention is because of his wife's notoriety.
From what I remember, he didn't want her to be part of the administration because he didn't want to move the family to DC. I don't know but is he a little jealous of her success?
Personally, I just think it's kind of low-down. Don't try to make a name for yourself off your wife's success.
To me, this screams majorly selfish and unthoughtful toward his wife and likely extremely insecure guy. Though it seems Kelly anne wears the pants in the family so that doesn’t help this guy have a chance to become secure as a man. Some guys like to marry a mom - who takes care of things, a little controlling, they skate on many things for a while - then at some point they rebel like this.
This guy hates his wife. I wonder why he continues to constantly undermining her job at the White House. He needs to shut up and go away how embarrassing for her.
What kind of husband would ever do this? What a 100% prick.
He must be in competition with Trey Gowdy who is currently in talks with the networks for a job.
Conway’s critique of Calabrese’s Constitutional argument is accurate. But he ignores the Achilles Heel of Mueller’s appointment: it does not comply with the statutes that govern appointment of SC’s.
1) The statute allows SC’s only for criminal matters. The FBI investigation explicitly given to Mueller was, and was stated to be even by James Comey, a counterintelligence investigation. The statute makes no provision for counterintelligence investigations by SC’s.
2) The statute requires specification of specific crimes to be investigated, to avoid unleashing witch hunts. But “collusion with the Russians by the Trump campaign regarding the 2016 election” is not a crime under any known statute. Rosenstein’s authorization letter(s) are crafted to create a wide-tanging witch hunt.
3) The statute requires the AG or acting AG to assure that the appointee has no conflicts of interest. Mueller has massive conflicts of interest. Evaluation his conflicts seems to have been omitted by Deputy/Acting AG Rosenstein.
What a rotten piece of garbage he is.
It’s an argument about legal technicalities. I don’t know why he’s getting involved, but it’s possible to disagree with the probe without finding it violates the Constitution.
Georgie needs to STFU!! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH HIM??? WHY SABoutage YOUR WIFE, GEORGIE???
I don’t want to re-litigate the primaries, but this may be relevant:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/25/cruz-super-pac-ad-hits-trump-does-this-sound-conservative-video/
Keep The Promise 1, a super PAC supporting Sen.[crscore]Ted Cruz[/crscore], released two ads Monday in Iowa and South Carolina attacking Donald Trump on his previous support for partial-birth abortions and show him heaping praise on Cruz for fighting against Obamacare.
The ads titled “I Like Ted Cruz” and “EXTREME” are part of a previously announced $2.5 million TV buy in the two early primary states, and will be airing throughout this week.
Kellyanne Conway, president of Keep the Promise 1, said, “The life of a child at 8 or 9 months gestation is not a political football; it is a matter of principle and conscience.”
Outside of the sort of backstabbing of the spouse ... and returning to the constitutionality of the appointment.
Per Wiki:
The Court listed in Morrison v. Olson (1988) certain factors as hallmarks of “inferior Officer” status, such as removability by a higher executive branch official other than the President, and limitations on the officer’s duties, jurisdiction, and tenure. In Edmond v. United States (1997) the Court stated that “‘inferior Officers’ are officers whose work is directed and supervised at some level by others who were appointed by Presidential nomination with the advice and consent of the Senate.” Among those officers recognized as “inferior” are district court clerks, federal supervisors of elections, the Watergate Special Prosecutor, and an Independent Counsel appointed under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978.
This would lead me to believe that the defense of Mueller’s appointment as constitution would rest on determining if Mueller was being supervised by someone at the DOJ. Since Sessions has recused, the only person left to supervise would be Rosestein.
Also, if firing / removing Mueller is “Obstruction of Justice” then he is NOT an inferior officer and his appointment was unconstitutional in the first place.
So, if the appointment is constitutional, then Rosestein or the President can remove from office without it being obstruction.
Just my take.
What a tubby creep. I’m always suspicious when I see a woman with any type of decent looks married to a guy like that
Have the divorce papers been issued?
Fat boy does corporate law..I trust Levin and Jarrett and others including Andy McCarthy
I’ll put up Mark Levin and Prof. Calabresi against George Conway any time in court.
I greatly respect Kelley Anne Conway. Met her when she and Dinesh D’Souza were running the “3rd Generation” lecture series at the Heritage Foundation.
Both were kind, smart, had a good sense of humor, and wanted to talk to the audience in attendance. They were a breath of fresh air in the old stogy GOP ruling elite.
Does this guy have a drinking problem?